[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aS-0DNw3Jnw4ZR-y@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 19:52:44 -0800
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To: Pawel Mielimonka <pawel.mielimonka@...itsu.com>
CC: <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dave@...olabs.net>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] cxl/cli: add helpers to collect and sort
regions by HPA
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:38:23PM +0900, Pawel Mielimonka wrote:
> Introduce cmp_region_hpa() and collect_regions_sorted() helpers to
> enumerate CXL regions under a given decoder and sort them by their host
> physical address.
> These helpers will be used by the "cxl destroy-region" command to tear
> down regions in HPA-descending order, i.e. in the reverse order of
> region creation. This matches the decoder programming requirements from
> the CXL specification (8.2.4.20.12 - continuous HPA coverage at all
> times when Lock On Commit is used) and avoids teardown sequences that
> can leve decoder state inconsistent when the decoder is fully populated
> (known problem).
> This patch only adds the helpers; no functional changes is intended yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Mielimonka <pawel.mielimonka@...itsu.com>
> ---
> cxl/region.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cxl/region.c b/cxl/region.c
> index 207cf2d0..58765b3d 100644
> --- a/cxl/region.c
> +++ b/cxl/region.c
> @@ -831,6 +831,61 @@ out:
> return cxl_region_disable(region);
> }
>
> +static int cmp_region_hpa(const void *l, const void *r)
> +{
> + const struct cxl_region *const *left = l;
> + const struct cxl_region *const *right = r;
> + u64 left_start = cxl_region_get_resource((struct cxl_region *) *left);
> + u64 right_start = cxl_region_get_resource((struct cxl_region *) *right);
> +
> + if (left_start < right_start)
> + return -1;
> + if (left_start > right_start)
> + return 1;
Suggest calling them hpa's and using this more common kernel compare pattern.
(yeah, in ndctl, cxl/cli, we try to be like kernel)
static int cmp_region_hpa(const void *a, const void *b)
{
const struct cxl_region *const *r1 = a;
const struct cxl_region *const *r2 = b;
u64 hpa1 = cxl_region_get_resource((struct cxl_region *) *r1);
u64 hpa2 = cxl_region_get_resource((struct cxl_region *) *r2);
return (hpa1 > hpa2) - (hpa1 < hpa2);
}
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int collect_regions_sorted(struct cxl_decoder *root,
> + const char *filter,
> + struct cxl_region ***out,
> + int *out_nr)
> +{
I think there is an alignment issue above.
The filter parameter is always called w NULL in patcht 2.
If it's not going to be used, remove it.
> + struct cxl_region *region;
> + struct cxl_region **list = NULL;
> + int nr = 0, alloc = 0;
> +
> + cxl_region_foreach(root, region) {
> + if (filter && !util_cxl_region_filter(region, filter))
> + continue;
> + if (nr == alloc) {
> + int new_alloc = alloc ? alloc * 2 : 8;
> + int new_size = (size_t)new_alloc * sizeof(*list);
Looks like new_size should be size_t to match what realloc() expects.
> + struct cxl_region **tmp;
> +
> + tmp = realloc(list, new_size);
> + if (!tmp) {
> + free(list);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + list = tmp;
> + alloc = new_alloc;
> + }
> + list[nr++] = region;
> + }
> +
> + if (!nr) {
> + free(list);
> + *out = NULL;
> + *out_nr = 0;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + qsort(list, nr, sizeof(*list), cmp_region_hpa);
> + *out = list;
> + *out_nr = nr;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int destroy_region(struct cxl_region *region)
> {
> const char *devname = cxl_region_get_devname(region);
> --
> 2.45.1.windows.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists