[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40cd9574-ac26-45c9-91a4-b08ad799ca99@baylibre.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:50:14 -0600
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Shrikant Raskar <raskar.shree97@...il.com>,
Per-Daniel Olsson <perdaniel.olsson@...s.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() naming
On 12/3/25 1:18 PM, Kurt Borja wrote:
> Rename iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() -> iio_device_claim_buffer() to
> match iio_device_claim_direct().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>
> ---
If we decide to do this, I would squash this with the previous patch
to make a clean break of it. Although it is helpful to have "mode"
in the name if we can keep that without breaking things.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists