[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <531cd8e9-2b15-495d-ae77-927011dfa54d@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 02:15:25 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Wunderlich <frankwu@....de>,
Avinash Jayaraman <ajayaraman@...linear.com>,
Bing tao Xu <bxu@...linear.com>, Liang Xu <lxu@...linear.com>,
Juraj Povazanec <jpovazanec@...linear.com>,
"Fanni (Fang-Yi) Chan" <fchan@...linear.com>,
"Benny (Ying-Tsan) Weng" <yweng@...linear.com>,
"Livia M. Rosu" <lrosu@...linear.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 2/3] net: dsa: add tag formats for MxL862xx
switches
> + /* special tag ingress */
> + mxl862_tag = dsa_etype_header_pos_tx(skb);
> + mxl862_tag[0] = htons(ETH_P_MXLGSW);
> + mxl862_tag[2] = htons(usr_port + 16 - cpu_port);
> + mxl862_tag[3] = htons(FIELD_PREP(MXL862_IGP_EGP, cpu_port));
You appear to be leaving mxl862_tag[1] uninitialised. Is that
intentional?
This is a pretty odd tag format. The destination port is relative to
the CPU port? You need to include the CPU port in the tag itself? Is
this publicly documented somewhere?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists