[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfXSJFN9Ev8_bChvMuxP5T+u2wgd=3=aQnvjkHaNCF_ew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 11:21:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Crescent Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 29/31] serial: 8250_mxpcie: Add sysfs to control terminator
On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 4:55 AM Crescent Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 04:40:51AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 12:46 PM Crescent Hsieh
> > <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com> wrote:
...
> > > Example usage:
> > >
> > > # Enable terminator on ttyS*
> > > echo 1 > /sys/class/tty/ttyS*/mxpcie8250_terminator
> > >
> > > # Check current state
> > > cat /sys/class/tty/ttyS*/mxpcie8250_terminator
> > > enabled
> >
> > This introduces an ABI without documentation update. It's no go.
>
> Just to confirm my understanding — for any new user-visible ABI such
> as a sysfs attribute, the corresponding documentation under
> Documentation/ABI/ must be included in the same patch/series?
Yes.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists