[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffd6dc9a-372d-4db9-9c2e-92f126cb5ebe@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 12:29:42 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Swati Agarwal <swati.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans-evk: Add host mode support for
USB1 controller
On 12/3/25 3:42 AM, Swati Agarwal wrote:
> Enable Host mode support for USB1 controller on EVK Platform.
>
> For secondary USB Typec port, there is a genesys USB HUB sitting in between
> SOC and HD3SS3220 Type-C port controller and SS lines run from the SoC
> through the hub to the Port controller. Mark the second USB controller as
> host only capable.
>
> Added HD3SS3220 Type-C port controller along with Type-c connector for
> controlling vbus supply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Agarwal <swati.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> This patch depends on:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251128102507.3206169-1-krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com/
Please work on enabling both ports at the same time on the next
occasion.
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts
> index 2536ebe36edbfd146e07d5698779767acff87ab4..07389593b3cd4728357255d47156c6861cbabb5e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts
> @@ -67,6 +67,34 @@ usb0_con_ss_ep: endpoint {
> };
> };
>
> + connector-1 {
> + compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> + label = "USB1-Type-C";
> + data-role = "dual";
> + power-role = "dual";
> +
> + vbus-supply = <&vbus_supply_regulator_1>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + usb1_con_hs_ep: endpoint {
> + };
You should really connect these endpoints somewhere.
> + };
> + port@1 {
Please add a \n above this line to separate the subnodes
[...]
> + usb-typec@47 {
> + compatible = "ti,hd3ss3220";
> + reg = <0x47>;
> + interrupts-extended = <&pmm8654au_2_gpios 6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> + id-gpios = <&tlmm 51 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&usb1_id>, <&usb1_intr_state>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + hd3ss3220_47_in_ep: endpoint {
How about rename the other one to hd3ss3220_0 and name this one hd3ss322_1?
_47 doesn't really tell us anything and may re-appear if there's another
instance of this IC on another I2C bus
[...]
> +&usb_1 {
> + dr_mode = "host";
The connector states it's a dual-role data and power device. Is there any
reason to keep this in host-only mode?
> + status = "okay";
Please add a \n above the status line to keep consistency with all other nodes
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists