lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73172e77-d656-4f50-934a-de8f0d9cac40@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:11:37 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>,
 Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Gustavo Padovan
 <gustavo@...ovan.org>, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
 Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
 Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
 Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin
 <tursulin@...ulin.net>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
 Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
 Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
 Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/ttm: Use dma_fence_check_and_signal()

On 12/1/25 11:50, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> The return code of dma_fence_signal() is not useful and shall be removed
> from the kernel. To do so, the few users who rely on the return code
> must be ported.
> 
> Use dma_fence_check_and_signal() and mapp its boolean return code to
> dma_fence_signal()'s former value for already-signaled fences.
> 
> Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
> index 1bcc67977f48..eaf2e91f8e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/tests/ttm_bo_validate_test.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int threaded_fence_signal(void *arg)
>  
>  	msleep(20);
>  
> -	return dma_fence_signal(fence);
> +	return dma_fence_check_and_signal(fence) ? -EINVAL : 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void ttm_bo_validate_move_fence_not_signaled(struct kunit *test)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ