[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025120310-likeness-subscript-f811@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:16:22 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com, yin.ding@...adcom.com,
tapas.kundu@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.12 0/4] sched: The newidle balance regression
On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 05:23:05PM +0530, Ajay Kaher wrote:
> Greg, following upstream patches will directly apply to v6.17, so I am
> not sending for v6.17:
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d206fbad9328ddb68ebabd7cf7413392acd38081.patch
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/e78e70dbf603c1425f15f32b455ca148c932f6c1.patch
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/08d473dd8718e4a4d698b1113a14a40ad64a909b.patch
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/33cf66d88306663d16e4759e9d24766b0aaa2e17.patch
Please don't use github for kernel stuff....
Anyway, these are not in a -rc kernel yet, so I really shouldn't be
taking them unless the author/maintainer agrees they should go in
"right now". And given that these weren't even marked as cc: stable in
the first place, why the rush?
Also, you forgot about 6.18.y, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists