| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7xbqq2uplwkc36q6jyorxe6u3fboka3snwar6parado5ysz25o@qrstyzh3okgh> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:46:03 +0000 From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org> To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> Cc: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "Wu, Binbin" <binbin.wu@...el.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, "nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>, "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] x86/virt/tdx: Add tdx_alloc/free_page() helpers On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 08:02:38PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote: > On Tue, 2025-12-02 at 09:38 +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > Yea, it could be simpler if it was always guaranteed to be 2 pages. But it > > > was > > > my understanding that it would not be a fixed size. Can you point to what > > > docs > > > makes you think that? > > > > Looking at the PHYMEM.PAMT.ADD ABI spec the pages being added are always > > put into pair in rdx/r8. So e.g. looking into tdh_phymem_pamt_add rcx is > > set to a 2mb page, and subsequently we have the memcpy which simply sets > > the rdx/r8 input argument registers, no ? Or am I misunderstanding the > > code? > > Hmm, you are totally right. The docs specify the size of the 4k entries, but > doesn't specify that Dynamic PAMT is supposed to provide larger sizes in the > other registers. A reasonable reading could assume 2 pages always, and the usage > of the other registers seems like an assumption. > > Kirill, any history here? There was a plan to future prove DPAMT by allowing PAMT descriptor to grow in the future. The concrete approach was not settled last time I checked. This code was my attempt to accommodate it. I don't know if it fits the current plan. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists