[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF52mibA0m8OCzqvM2xwb28C03_YEU9Nz7ecGDpGzE3wiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 14:46:26 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] replaced system_unbound_wq, added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue
On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 8:17 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> It looks like it was picked up, the thank you email must have become lost:
>
> 5c467151f6197d IB/isert: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
> 65d21dee533755 IB/iser: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
> 7196156b0ce3dc IB/rdmavt: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
> 5267feda50680c RDMA/mlx4: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
> 5f93287fa9d0db hfi1: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
> e60c5583b661da RDMA/core: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
> f673fb3449fcd8 RDMA/core: RDMA/mlx5: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
>
> Jason
Aha, thank you and sorry for the useless email!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
Powered by blists - more mailing lists