linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 09/31] serial: 8250: split 8250_mxpcie from 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aS-mTGjGtn1gQuvI@moxa-ThinkCentre-M90t>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:54:04 +0800
From: Crescent Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/31] serial: 8250: split 8250_mxpcie from 8250_pci

On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 09:22:20PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 12:44 PM Crescent Hsieh
> <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com> wrote:
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> 
> This needs more headers to be included
> 
> bitfield.h
> bits.h
> dev_printk.h
> device/devres.h
> ioport.h
> types.h

May I ask a clarification: my understanding was to include headers only
when the corresponding symbols are directly used.

Is the intention here to avoid relying on implicit includes and to make
the driver’s dependencies explicit?

---
Sincerely,
Crescent Hsieh