[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9188e96-9ffa-4815-ab22-735e2506fe93@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 10:45:45 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Edwin Peer <epeer@...dia.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/31] gpu: nova-core: Hopper/Blackwell: add FMC signature
extraction
Hi John,
On 12/3/2025 12:59 AM, John Hubbard wrote:
> Add extract_fmc_signatures_static() to parse cryptographic signatures
> from FMC ELF firmware sections. This extracts the SHA-384 hash, RSA
> public key, and signature needed for Chain of Trust verification.
>
> Also exposes the elf_section() helper from firmware.rs for use by FSP.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/nova-core/fsp.rs | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs
> index 5cbb8be7434f..7f8d62f9ceba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/firmware.rs
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> },
> };
>
> +pub(crate) use elf::elf_section;
> +
> pub(crate) mod booter;
> pub(crate) mod fsp;
> pub(crate) mod fwsec;
> @@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ fn elf32_section<'a>(elf: &'a [u8], name: &str) -> Option<&'a [u8]> {
> }
>
> /// Automatically detects ELF32 vs ELF64 based on the ELF header.
> - pub(super) fn elf_section<'a>(elf: &'a [u8], name: &str) -> Option<&'a [u8]> {
> + pub(crate) fn elf_section<'a>(elf: &'a [u8], name: &str) -> Option<&'a [u8]> {
> // Check ELF magic.
> if elf.len() < 5 || elf.get(0..4)? != b"\x7fELF" {
> return None;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/fsp.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/fsp.rs
> index 389c43bfd538..311b6d4c6011 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/fsp.rs
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/fsp.rs
> @@ -256,4 +256,108 @@ pub(crate) fn wait_secure_boot(
> })
> .map(|_| ())
> }
> +
> + /// Extract FMC firmware signatures for Chain of Trust verification.
> + ///
> + /// Extracts real cryptographic signatures from FMC ELF32 firmware sections.
> + /// Returns signatures in a heap-allocated structure to prevent stack overflow.
> + pub(crate) fn extract_fmc_signatures_static(
> + dev: &device::Device<device::Bound>,
> + fmc_fw_data: &[u8],
> + ) -> Result<KBox<FmcSignatures>> {
> + dev_dbg!(dev, "FMC firmware size: {} bytes\n", fmc_fw_data.len());
Let us remove these? I think we discussed [1] that once things are working, we'd
not want these and can add it on-demand if needed.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/d6c9c7f2-098e-4b55-b754-4287b698fc1c@nvidia.com/
> +
> + // Extract hash section (SHA-384)
> + let hash_section = crate::firmware::elf_section(fmc_fw_data, "hash")
> + .ok_or(EINVAL)
> + .inspect_err(|_| dev_err!(dev, "FMC firmware missing 'hash' section\n"))?;
> +
> + // Extract public key section (RSA public key)
> + let pkey_section = crate::firmware::elf_section(fmc_fw_data, "publickey")
> + .ok_or(EINVAL)
> + .inspect_err(|_| dev_err!(dev, "FMC firmware missing 'publickey' section\n"))?;
> +
> + // Extract signature section (RSA signature)
> + let sig_section = crate::firmware::elf_section(fmc_fw_data, "signature")
> + .ok_or(EINVAL)
> + .inspect_err(|_| dev_err!(dev, "FMC firmware missing 'signature' section\n"))?;
> +
> + dev_dbg!(
> + dev,
> + "FMC ELF sections: hash={} bytes, pkey={} bytes, sig={} bytes\n",
> + hash_section.len(),
> + pkey_section.len(),
> + sig_section.len()
> + );
> +
Here as well.
> + // Validate section sizes - hash must be exactly 48 bytes
> + if hash_section.len() != FSP_HASH_SIZE {
> + dev_err!(
> + dev,
> + "FMC hash section size {} != expected {}\n",
> + hash_section.len(),
> + FSP_HASH_SIZE
> + );
> + return Err(EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + // Public key and signature can be smaller than the fixed array sizes
> + if pkey_section.len() > FSP_PKEY_SIZE * 4 {
> + dev_err!(
> + dev,
> + "FMC publickey section size {} > maximum {}\n",
> + pkey_section.len(),
> + FSP_PKEY_SIZE * 4
> + );
> + return Err(EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + if sig_section.len() > FSP_SIG_SIZE * 4 {
> + dev_err!(
> + dev,
> + "FMC signature section size {} > maximum {}\n",
> + sig_section.len(),
> + FSP_SIG_SIZE * 4
> + );
> + return Err(EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + // Allocate signature structure on heap to avoid stack overflow
> + let mut signatures = KBox::new(FmcSignatures::default(), GFP_KERNEL)?;
> +
> + // Copy hash section directly as bytes (48 bytes exactly)
> + // SAFETY: hash384 is a [u32; 12] array (48 bytes), and we create a byte slice of
> + // exactly FSP_HASH_SIZE (48) bytes. The pointer is valid and properly aligned.
> + let hash_bytes = unsafe {
> + core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(
> + signatures.hash384.as_mut_ptr().cast::<u8>(),
> + FSP_HASH_SIZE,
> + )
> + };
> + hash_bytes.copy_from_slice(hash_section);
> +
> + // Copy public key section (up to 388 bytes, zero-padded)
> + // SAFETY: public_key is a [u32; 96] array (384 bytes), and we create a byte slice of
> + // FSP_PKEY_SIZE * 4 bytes. The pointer is valid and properly aligned.
> + let pkey_bytes = unsafe {
> + core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(
> + signatures.public_key.as_mut_ptr().cast::<u8>(),
> + FSP_PKEY_SIZE * 4,
> + )
> + };
> + pkey_bytes[..pkey_section.len()].copy_from_slice(pkey_section);
Even if this works in practice, I believe it's UB as the `from_raw_parts_mut()`
should have the entire slice range to be valid memory (see [2]), but
FSP_PKEY_SIZE * 4 is 388 bytes while public_key is only 384 bytes ([u32; 96]).
This is vulnerable as the KBox holding the signature may not have the extra
space even if it does now.
Can we create a slice with exactly the bytes we need? something like:
let pkey_bytes = unsafe {
core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(
signatures.public_key.as_mut_ptr().cast::<u8>(),
pkey_section.len(),
)
};
pkey_bytes.copy_from_slice(pkey_section);
Another reason for doing this is, the code is more fragile left as is, as there
is a risk of unrelated memory leaking into the slice and accessed by new/future
code.
[2] "Behavior is undefined if any of the following conditions are violated"
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/slice/fn.from_raw_parts_mut.html
thanks,
- Joel
> +
> + // Copy signature section (up to 384 bytes, zero-padded)
> + // SAFETY: signature is a [u32; 96] array (384 bytes), and we create a byte slice of
> + // FSP_SIG_SIZE * 4 bytes. The pointer is valid and properly aligned.
> + let sig_bytes = unsafe {
> + core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(
> + signatures.signature.as_mut_ptr().cast::<u8>(),
> + FSP_SIG_SIZE * 4,
> + )
> + };
> + sig_bytes[..sig_section.len()].copy_from_slice(sig_section);
> +
> + Ok(signatures)
> + }
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists