linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/392] 5.15.197-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025120440-evaporate-crawlers-ac2a@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:31:45 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, achill@...ill.org, sr@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/392] 5.15.197-rc1 review

On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 10:51:17AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/3/25 10:46, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 04:22:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.197 release.
> > > There are 392 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > 
> > I'm seeing a build failure in the KVM selftests on arm64 with this, due
> > to dddac591bc98 (tools bitmap: Add missing asm-generic/bitsperlong.h
> > include):
> > 
> > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wuninitialized -O2 -g -std=gnu9
> > 9 -fno-stack-protector -fno-PIE -I../../../../tools/include -I../../../../tools/
> > arch/arm64/include -I../../../../usr/include/ -Iinclude -I. -Iinclude/aarch64 -I
> > ..   -pthread  -no-pie    dirty_log_perf_test.c /build/stage/build-work/kselftes
> > t/kvm/libkvm.a  -o /build/stage/build-work/kselftest/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test
> > In file included from ../../../../tools/include/linux/bitmap.h:6,
> >                   from dirty_log_perf_test.c:15:
> > ../../../../tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:14:2: error: #error Inconsis
> > tent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
> >     14 | #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
> >        |  ^~~~~
> > In file included from ../../../../usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:12,
> >                   from ../../../../usr/include/asm-generic/types.h:7,
> >                   from ../../../../usr/include/asm/types.h:1,
> >                   from ../../../../tools/include/linux/bitops.h:5,
> >                   from ../../../../tools/include/linux/bitmap.h:8:
> > ../../../../usr/include/asm/bitsperlong.h:20:9: warning: "__BITS_PER_LONG" redefined
> >     20 | #define __BITS_PER_LONG 64
> >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from ../../../../tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:5:
> > ../../../../tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:12:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> >     12 | #define __BITS_PER_LONG 32
> >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Yes this also affects building "perf".

Now dropped, thanks.

greg k-h