linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/392] 5.15.197-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025120428-manly-squatting-f3eb@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:36:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org,
	sr@...dewatkins.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.maria.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
	Ben Copeland <benjamin.copeland@...aro.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/392] 5.15.197-rc1 review

On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 02:08:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 at 21:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.197 release.
> > There are 392 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Dec 2025 15:23:16 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.197-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> The arm, mips and powerpc builds failed on the stable-rc 5.15.197-rc1.
> 
> Build regressions: arm, fuse-tegra30.c:250:10: error: 'const struct
> tegra_fuse_soc' has no member named 'cells'
> Build regressions: arm, fuse-tegra30.c:250:18: error: initialization
> of 'const struct attribute_group *' from incompatible pointer type
> 'const struct nvmem_cell_info *' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> Build regressions: arm, fuse-tegra30.c:251:10: error: 'const struct
> tegra_fuse_soc' has no member named 'num_cells'
> 
> Build regressions: mips, tlb-r4k.c:591:31: error: passing argument 1
> of 'memblock_free' makes integer from pointer without a cast
> [-Werror=int-conversion]
> 
> Build regressions: powerpc, mm/mempool.c:68:17: error: 'for' loop
> initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> ARM build regressions are due to,
> 
>   soc/tegra: fuse: Add Tegra114 nvmem cells and fuse lookups
>   [ Upstream commit b9c01adedf38c69abb725a60a05305ef70dbce03 ]

dropped.

> MIPS build regressions are due to,
> 
>   MIPS: mm: kmalloc tlb_vpn array to avoid stack overflow
>   commit 841ecc979b18d3227fad5e2d6a1e6f92688776b5 upstream.

dropped.

> Powerpc build regressions are due to,
> 
>   mm/mempool: replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page()
>   [ Upstream commit f2bcc99a5e901a13b754648d1dbab60f4adf9375 ]

dropped.

thanks!

greg k-h