[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DEPM3WWMT76K.P5E00DKJ73UO@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 12:35:38 -0500
From: "Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@...il.com>
To: "David Lechner" <dlechner@...libre.com>, "Kurt Borja"
<kuurtb@...il.com>, "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@...afoo.de>, "Michael Hennerich"
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@...omium.org>, "Antoniu Miclaus"
<antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>, "Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@...omium.org>,
"Shrikant Raskar" <raskar.shree97@...il.com>, "Per-Daniel Olsson"
<perdaniel.olsson@...s.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, "Andy Shevchenko"
<andy@...nel.org>, "Guenter Roeck" <groeck@...omium.org>, "Jonathan
Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() naming
On Wed Dec 3, 2025 at 4:50 PM -05, David Lechner wrote:
> On 12/3/25 1:18 PM, Kurt Borja wrote:
>> Rename iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() -> iio_device_claim_buffer() to
>> match iio_device_claim_direct().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@...il.com>
>> ---
> If we decide to do this, I would squash this with the previous patch
> to make a clean break of it. Although it is helpful to have "mode"
> in the name if we can keep that without breaking things.
Agree, but If rename iio_device_claim_direct() that would be too big and
I think it should be separate patches.
--
~ Kurt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists