[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e4e19e2-8aff-44a1-ba4d-2a4519745a3d@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:09:54 -0600
From: "Cheatham, Benjamin" <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
<terry.bowman@....com>, <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Alejandro Lucero
<alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] cxl/mem: Convert devm_cxl_add_memdev() to
scope-based-cleanup
[snip]
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_FREE(put_cxlmd, struct cxl_memdev *,
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(_T)) put_device(&_T->dev);)
> +
> /*
> * Core helper for devm_cxl_add_memdev() that wants to both create a device and
> * assert to the caller that upon return cxl_mem::probe() has been invoked.
> @@ -1057,45 +1084,28 @@ static const struct file_operations cxl_memdev_fops = {
> struct cxl_memdev *__devm_cxl_add_memdev(struct device *host,
> struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> {
> - struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
> struct device *dev;
> - struct cdev *cdev;
> int rc;
>
> - cxlmd = cxl_memdev_alloc(cxlds, &cxl_memdev_fops);
> + struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd __free(put_cxlmd) =
> + cxl_memdev_alloc(cxlds, &cxl_memdev_fops);
> if (IS_ERR(cxlmd))
> return cxlmd;
>
> dev = &cxlmd->dev;
> rc = dev_set_name(dev, "mem%d", cxlmd->id);
> if (rc)
> - goto err;
> -
> - /*
> - * Activate ioctl operations, no cxl_memdev_rwsem manipulation
> - * needed as this is ordered with cdev_add() publishing the device.
> - */
> - cxlmd->cxlds = cxlds;
> - cxlds->cxlmd = cxlmd;
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
>
> - cdev = &cxlmd->cdev;
> - rc = cdev_device_add(cdev, dev);
> + rc = cxlmd_add(cxlmd, cxlds);
> if (rc)
> - goto err;
> + return ERR_PTR(rc);
>
> - rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(host, cxl_memdev_unregister, cxlmd);
> + rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(host, cxl_memdev_unregister,
> + no_free_ptr(cxlmd));
> if (rc)
> return ERR_PTR(rc);
> return cxlmd;
Isn't cxlmd zeroed out by no_free_ptr() above? I think what needs to happen here is:
rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(host, cxl_memdev_unregister, cxlmd);
if (rc) {
no_free_ptr(cxlmd);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
}
return_ptr(cxlmd);
Looking ahead, this gets nullified in patch 6/6 so I guess it's only an issue if
someone is in the middle of a bisect (or doesn't pick up patch 6/6 for some reason).
> -
> -err:
> - /*
> - * The cdev was briefly live, shutdown any ioctl operations that
> - * saw that state.
> - */
> - cxl_memdev_shutdown(dev);
> - put_device(dev);
> - return ERR_PTR(rc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES(__devm_cxl_add_memdev, "cxl_mem");
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists