[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176487600628.940161.471761997237181377.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2025 19:20:06 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: thinker.li@...il.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, sidraya@...ux.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com,
mjambigi@...ux.ibm.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bpf, net: Fix smc for CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:29:14 +0100 you wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y, but CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n (e.g. m68k/allmodconfig),
> net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c fails to build.
>
> This patch series fix the issue in two ways, by:
> 1. fixing the dummy variant of register_bpf_struct_ops(),
> 2. making SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF depend on BPF_JIT.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [1/2] bpf: Fix register_bpf_struct_ops() dummy
(no matching commit)
- [2/2] net: smc: SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF should depend on BPF_JIT
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/861111b69896
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists