[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251204210959.9672-1-mpellizzer.dev@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 22:09:59 +0100
From: Massimiliano Pellizzer <mpellizzer.dev@...il.com>
To: clm@...com,
dsterba@...e.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Massimiliano Pellizzer <mpellizzer.dev@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: remove dead assignment in prepare_one_folio()
In prepare_one_folio(), ret is initialized to 0 at declaration,
and in an error path we assign ret = 0 before jumping to the
again label to retry the operation. However, ret is immediately
overwritten by ret = set_folio_extent_mapped(folio) after the
again label.
Both assignments are never observed by any code path,
therefore they can be safely removed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Massimiliano Pellizzer <mpellizzer.dev@...il.com>
---
v2: Remove also the initial ret = 0 assignment for consistency
fs/btrfs/file.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 7a501e73d880..9e2c2f2cd03f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static noinline int prepare_one_folio(struct inode *inode, struct folio **folio_
fgf_t fgp_flags = (nowait ? FGP_WRITEBEGIN | FGP_NOWAIT : FGP_WRITEBEGIN) |
fgf_set_order(write_bytes);
struct folio *folio;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
again:
folio = __filemap_get_folio(inode->i_mapping, index, fgp_flags, mask);
@@ -877,7 +877,6 @@ static noinline int prepare_one_folio(struct inode *inode, struct folio **folio_
/* The folio is already unlocked. */
folio_put(folio);
if (!nowait && ret == -EAGAIN) {
- ret = 0;
goto again;
}
return ret;
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists