linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a699a3aa-50b8-4258-ba71-d28c6abc9f7c@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:44:49 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the block tree

On 12/4/25 3:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commits
> 
>   d3132d5a1720 ("nvmet-fc: use pr_* print macros instead of dev_*")
>   facf78e89270 ("nvmet-fcloop: remove unused lsdir member.")
>   d4a3dc77e6d6 ("nvmet-fcloop: check all request and response have been processed")
>   92ee1738dd50 ("nvme-fc: check all request and response have been processed")
> 
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

Oops yes - keith is redoing it, I'll re-pull when that's done.

-- 
Jens Axboe