[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89ecddb7-83ee-427b-823b-984204939ecf@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 12:22:13 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with
in_lazy_mmu_mode()
On 24/11/25 6:52 PM, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> The generic lazy_mmu layer now tracks whether a task is in lazy MMU
> mode. As a result we no longer need a TIF flag for that purpose -
> let's use the new in_lazy_mmu_mode() helper instead.
>
> The explicit check for in_interrupt() is no longer necessary either
> as in_lazy_mmu_mode() always returns false in interrupt context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 19 +++----------------
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index a7d99dee3dc4..dd7ed653a20d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -62,28 +62,16 @@ static inline void emit_pte_barriers(void)
>
> static inline void queue_pte_barriers(void)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - if (in_interrupt()) {
> - emit_pte_barriers();
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - flags = read_thread_flags();
> -
> - if (flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU)) {
> + if (in_lazy_mmu_mode()) {
> /* Avoid the atomic op if already set. */
> - if (!(flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING)))
> + if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING))
A small nit - will it be better not to use test_thread_flag() here and just
keep checking flags like earlier to avoid non-related changes. Although not
a problem TBH.
> set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
> } else {
> emit_pte_barriers();
> }
> }
>
> -static inline void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> -{
> - set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
> -}
> +static inline void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void) {}
>
> static inline void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> {
> @@ -94,7 +82,6 @@ static inline void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> {
> arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> - clear_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index f241b8601ebd..4ff8da0767d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -84,8 +84,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void);
> #define TIF_SME_VL_INHERIT 28 /* Inherit SME vl_onexec across exec */
> #define TIF_KERNEL_FPSTATE 29 /* Task is in a kernel mode FPSIMD section */
> #define TIF_TSC_SIGSEGV 30 /* SIGSEGV on counter-timer access */
> -#define TIF_LAZY_MMU 31 /* Task in lazy mmu mode */
> -#define TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING 32 /* Ops pending for lazy mmu mode exit */
> +#define TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING 31 /* Ops pending for lazy mmu mode exit */
>
> #define _TIF_SIGPENDING (1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
> #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
LGTM.
Hence with or without the 'flags' changes in queue_pte_barriers() above.
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists