lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f89f5f1-8743-4902-b103-66287a33c5ba@hisilicon.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:36:47 +0800
From: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>
To: Pengjie Zhang <zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>, <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	<kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>, <yubowen8@...wei.com>,
	<linhongye@...artners.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PM / devfreq: use _visible attribute to replace
 create/remove_sysfs_files()



On 11/7/2025 11:17 AM, Pengjie Zhang wrote:
> Previously, non-generic attributes (polling_interval, timer) used separate 
> create/delete logic, leading to race conditions during concurrent access in
> creation/deletion. Multi-threaded operations also caused inconsistencies   
> between governor capabilities and attribute states.                        
>                                                                            
> 1.Use is_visible + sysfs_update_group() to unify management of these       
> attributes, eliminating creation/deletion races.                           
> 2.Add locks and validation to these attributes, ensuring consistency       
> between current governor capabilities and attribute operations in          
> multi-threaded environments.                                               
>                                                                            
> Signed-off-by: Pengjie Zhang <zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>                    
Hi Pengjie,

The motivation looks fine but the implementation of gov_group_visible() and
gov_attr_visible() doesn't work right in my view.

See comments below.

Thanks!
Jie
> ---                                                                        
> changes in v3:                                                             
> - Use guard() to simplify lock acquisition and destruction.                
> - Eliminate redundant checks for df.                                       
> Link to v2:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251028022458.2824872-1-zhangpengjie2@huawei.com/
>                                                                            
> Changes in v2:                                                             
> - Fix one problem reported by the kernel test robot.                       
> - Redirect all error paths in timer_store() to out to ensure locks are not 
>  left unReleased.                                                          
> Link to v1:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251025135238.3576861-1-zhangpengjie2@huawei.com/
> 
>  drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index 2e8d01d47f69..674b794d553d 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  
>  static struct class *devfreq_class;
>  static struct dentry *devfreq_debugfs;
> +static const struct attribute_group gov_attr_group;
>  
>  /*
>   * devfreq core provides delayed work based load monitoring helper
> @@ -785,11 +786,6 @@ static void devfreq_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  	kfree(devfreq);
>  }
>  
> -static void create_sysfs_files(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> -				const struct devfreq_governor *gov);
> -static void remove_sysfs_files(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> -				const struct devfreq_governor *gov);
> -
>  /**
>   * devfreq_add_device() - Add devfreq feature to the device
>   * @dev:	the device to add devfreq feature.
> @@ -956,7 +952,10 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>  			 __func__);
>  		goto err_init;
>  	}
> -	create_sysfs_files(devfreq, devfreq->governor);
> +
> +	err = sysfs_update_group(&devfreq->dev.kobj, &gov_attr_group);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_init;
>  
>  	list_add(&devfreq->node, &devfreq_list);
>  
> @@ -998,9 +997,7 @@ int devfreq_remove_device(struct devfreq *devfreq)
>  	if (devfreq->governor) {
>  		devfreq->governor->event_handler(devfreq,
>  						 DEVFREQ_GOV_STOP, NULL);
> -		remove_sysfs_files(devfreq, devfreq->governor);
>  	}
> -
>  	device_unregister(&devfreq->dev);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1460,7 +1457,6 @@ static ssize_t governor_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  			 __func__, df->governor->name, ret);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -	remove_sysfs_files(df, df->governor);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Start the new governor and create the specific sysfs files
> @@ -1489,7 +1485,7 @@ static ssize_t governor_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  	 * Create the sysfs files for the new governor. But if failed to start
>  	 * the new governor, restore the sysfs files of previous governor.
>  	 */
> -	create_sysfs_files(df, df->governor);
> +	ret = sysfs_update_group(&df->dev.kobj, &gov_attr_group);
>  
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&devfreq_list_lock);
> @@ -1807,17 +1803,22 @@ static struct attribute *devfreq_attrs[] = {
>  	&dev_attr_trans_stat.attr,
>  	NULL,
>  };
> -ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(devfreq);
>  
>  static ssize_t polling_interval_show(struct device *dev,
>  				     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>  	struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
> +	int ret;
No need of this if restore the last line.
>  
> -	if (!df->profile)
> +	guard(mutex)(&devfreq_list_lock);
> +
> +	if (!df->profile || !df->governor ||
> +	    !IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(df->governor->attrs, POLLING_INTERVAL))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", df->profile->polling_ms);
It's fine to keep this line.
> +	ret = sprintf(buf, "%d\n", df->profile->polling_ms);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t polling_interval_store(struct device *dev,
> @@ -1828,7 +1829,10 @@ static ssize_t polling_interval_store(struct device *dev,
>  	unsigned int value;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!df->governor)
> +	guard(mutex)(&devfreq_list_lock);
> +
> +	if (!df->governor ||
> +	    !IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(df->governor->attrs, POLLING_INTERVAL))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &value);
> @@ -1847,7 +1851,10 @@ static ssize_t timer_show(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
>  
> -	if (!df->profile)
> +	guard(mutex)(&devfreq_list_lock);
> +
> +	if (!df->profile || !df->governor ||
> +	    !IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(df->governor->attrs, TIMER))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", timer_name[df->profile->timer]);
> @@ -1861,7 +1868,10 @@ static ssize_t timer_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  	int timer = -1;
>  	int ret = 0, i;
>  
> -	if (!df->governor || !df->profile)
> +	guard(mutex)(&devfreq_list_lock);
> +
> +	if (!df->governor || !df->profile ||
> +	    !IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(df->governor->attrs, TIMER))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	ret = sscanf(buf, "%16s", str_timer);
> @@ -1905,36 +1915,54 @@ static ssize_t timer_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>  }
>  static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(timer);
>  
> -#define CREATE_SYSFS_FILE(df, name)					\
> -{									\
> -	int ret;							\
> -	ret = sysfs_create_file(&df->dev.kobj, &dev_attr_##name.attr);	\
> -	if (ret < 0) {							\
> -		dev_warn(&df->dev,					\
> -			"Unable to create attr(%s)\n", "##name");	\
> -	}								\
> -}									\
> +static struct attribute *governor_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_polling_interval.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_timer.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
>  
> -/* Create the specific sysfs files which depend on each governor. */
> -static void create_sysfs_files(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> -				const struct devfreq_governor *gov)
> +static umode_t gov_attr_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> +				struct attribute *attr, int n)
>  {
> -	if (IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(gov->attrs, POLLING_INTERVAL))
> -		CREATE_SYSFS_FILE(devfreq, polling_interval);
> -	if (IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(gov->attrs, TIMER))
> -		CREATE_SYSFS_FILE(devfreq, timer);
> +	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> +	struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
> +
> +	if (!df->governor || !df->governor->attrs)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(df->governor->attrs, POLLING_INTERVAL))
> +		return attr->mode;
> +	if (IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(df->governor->attrs, TIMER))
> +		return attr->mode;
This would expose both 'timer' and 'polling_interval' if either of them is
supported, which is wrong.
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -/* Remove the specific sysfs files which depend on each governor. */
> -static void remove_sysfs_files(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> -				const struct devfreq_governor *gov)
> +static bool gov_group_visible(struct kobject *kobj)
>  {
> -	if (IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(gov->attrs, POLLING_INTERVAL))
> -		sysfs_remove_file(&devfreq->dev.kobj,
> -				&dev_attr_polling_interval.attr);
> -	if (IS_SUPPORTED_ATTR(gov->attrs, TIMER))
> -		sysfs_remove_file(&devfreq->dev.kobj, &dev_attr_timer.attr);
> +	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> +
> +	if (!dev)
> +		return false;
kobj_to_dev(kobj) can't fail.  This check is unnecessary.
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
> +DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE(gov);
The implementation of gov_group_visible() and gov_attr_visible() doesn't
seem to comply with the design of DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE().

DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE is defined as:

#define DEFINE_SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE(name)                             \
        static inline umode_t sysfs_group_visible_##name(            \
                struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int n) \
        {                                                            \
                if (n == 0 && !name##_group_visible(kobj))           \
                        return SYSFS_GROUP_INVISIBLE;                \
                return name##_attr_visible(kobj, attr, n);           \
        }

That means:
_group_visible controls whether to hide all the attrs in this group;
_attr_visible further decides whether to show each attr.

Hence,
1. gov_group_visible() should check if any attr in 'governor_attrs' should
be present, i.e. checking df->governor->attrs.
2. gov_attr_visible identifies which attr it is and checks whether the
governor supports it.

Neither is done in the above code, so this should be updated.
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group devfreq_group = {
> +	.attrs = devfreq_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group gov_attr_group = {
> +	.attrs = governor_attrs,
> +	.is_visible = SYSFS_GROUP_VISIBLE(gov),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct attribute_group *devfreq_groups[] = {
> +	&devfreq_group,
> +	&gov_attr_group,
> +	NULL
> +};
>  
>  /**
>   * devfreq_summary_show() - Show the summary of the devfreq devices

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ