[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251204094312.1029643-1-arnd@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 10:42:33 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@...il.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@...a.com>,
Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>,
Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: avoid warning for unused register_bpf_struct_ops()
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
The macro originally introduced in commit f6be98d19985 ("bpf, net:
switch to dynamic registration") causes a warning in the new smc code
because of the way it evaluates the arguments:
In file included from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7,
from net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c:13:
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c: In function 'bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_init':
include/linux/bpf.h:2076:50: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
2076 | #define register_bpf_struct_ops(st_ops, type) ({ (void *)(st_ops); 0; })
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c:139:16: note: in expansion of macro 'register_bpf_struct_ops'
139 | return register_bpf_struct_ops(&bpf_smc_hs_ctrl_ops, smc_hs_ctrl);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work around this using an inline function that takes the argument,
the same way as the normal implementation. Since the second argument to
register_bpf_struct_ops() is a type rather than an object, this still
has to be a macro, but it can call a new inline helper internally like
the normal one does.
Fixes: 15f295f55656 ("net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow")
Cc: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@...il.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
include/linux/btf.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 6498be4c44f8..eca6966d4f87 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2065,7 +2065,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
void bpf_map_struct_ops_info_fill(struct bpf_map_info *info, struct bpf_map *map);
void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc);
#else
-#define register_bpf_struct_ops(st_ops, type) ({ (void *)(st_ops); 0; })
+#define register_bpf_struct_ops(st_ops, type) __register_bpf_struct_ops(st_ops)
static inline bool bpf_try_module_get(const void *data, struct module *owner)
{
return try_module_get(owner);
diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index f06976ffb63f..799a75209536 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -535,6 +535,11 @@ int __register_bpf_struct_ops(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops);
const struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *bpf_struct_ops_find_value(struct btf *btf, u32 value_id);
const struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *bpf_struct_ops_find(struct btf *btf, u32 type_id);
#else
+struct bpf_struct_ops;
+static inline int __register_bpf_struct_ops(struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline const struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *bpf_struct_ops_find(struct btf *btf, u32 type_id)
{
return NULL;
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists