[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTGIjNiHhWHd_RkN@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 13:11:40 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jie Zhang <jzhang918@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@...log.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix oops when split header is enabled
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:54:16PM -0500, Jie Zhang wrote:
> For GMAC4, when split header is enabled, in some rare cases, the
> hardware does not fill buf2 of the first descriptor with payload.
> Thus we cannot assume buf2 is always fully filled if it is not
> the last descriptor. Otherwise, the length of buf2 of the second
> descriptor will be calculated wrong and cause an oops:
...
As a bug fix this should have a Fixes tag here
(no blank line between it and your Signed-off-by line).
As a rule of thumb, it should cite the patch where
the bug was introduced.
Perhaps in this case the following is appropriate:
Fixes: ec222003bd94 ("net: stmmac: Prepare to add Split Header support")
> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@...log.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists