[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1605571d-9199-41f9-9624-305357324b1b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:27:07 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Paul Sajna <sajattack@...tmarketos.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Amir Dahan <system64fumo@...a.io>,
Christopher Brown <crispybrown@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-lg-common: Sort nodes
and properties
On 12/4/25 2:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/12/2025 10:40, Paul Sajna wrote:
>> Improve adherance to style guidelines below:
>> https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Sajna <sajattack@...tmarketos.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi | 144 ++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
>> index 0ee2f4b99fbd..b8ab64a8de1c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
>> @@ -38,11 +38,6 @@ reserved-memory {
>> #size-cells = <2>;
>> ranges;
>>
>> - qseecom_mem: memory@...00000 {
>> - reg = <0 0xb2000000 0 0x1800000>;
>> - no-map;
>> - };
>> -
>> gpu_mem: memory@...15000 {
>> reg = <0 0x8c415000 0 0x2000>;
>> no-map;
>> @@ -99,7 +94,12 @@ memory@...00000 {
>> no-map;
>> };
>>
>> - rmtfs_mem: rmtfs-region@...00000 {
>
> Why?
>
>> + qseecom_mem: memory@...00000 {
>> + reg = <0 0xb2000000 0 0x1800000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + rmtfs_mem: memory@...01000 {
>
> No, you are doing much more then sorting. You are changing names to
> incorrect ones and maybe (tricky to say) change also unit address to
> buggy one.
>
> @Konrad,
> Why are we started resorting the addresses BEFORE we came up with proper
> linter? Why the rule suddenly changed?
I don't really mind small cleanups that are done as part of bigger
feature additions, as opposed to fixing a single file for the sake
of it
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists