lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77ff15d7-cdb9-46f7-9f05-97aff2dc8ee9@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 08:07:53 -0700
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
 imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 carlos.song@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dmaengine: Add cleanup FREE defines for
 dma_async_tx_descriptor



On 12/3/25 6:30 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 03:48:41PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/3/25 9:26 AM, Frank Li wrote:
>>> Add cleanup FREE defines for dma_async_tx_descriptor to support automatic
>>> cleanup and simplify error handling.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>> ---
>>> Check patch report exceed 100 chars, but it's still better put into one
>>> line to keep consistent with other DEFINE_FREE and better readablity
>>>
>>> change in v2
>>> - remove surpoiouse remove empty line
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/dmaengine.h | 3 +++
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>>> index 99efe2b9b4ea9844ca6161208362ef18ef111d96..27fa1646a807c49c781e1bce9e3e7d9a3c66f41d 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>>  #ifndef LINUX_DMAENGINE_H
>>>  #define LINUX_DMAENGINE_H
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>>>  #include <linux/device.h>
>>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>>  #include <linux/uio.h>
>>> @@ -1612,6 +1613,8 @@ static inline int dmaengine_desc_free(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc)
>>>  	return desc->desc_free(desc);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +DEFINE_FREE(dma_async_tx_descriptor, struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *, if (_T) dmaengine_desc_free(_T))
>>
>> maybe free_dma_async_tx may be clearer as the name vs dma_async_tx_descriptor.
> 
> If that, 'dmaengine_desc_free' is better because avoid create new name for
> it.

That works too.

> 
> Frank
>>
>> DJ
>>
>>> +
>>>  /* --- DMA device --- */
>>>
>>>  int dma_async_device_register(struct dma_device *device);
>>>
>>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ