[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTMFRkYZGtk3a_EP@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:16:06 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ice: Fix incorrect timeout in ice_release_res()
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 04:16:08PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
> The commit 5f6df173f92e ("ice: implement and use rd32_poll_timeout for
> ice_sq_done timeout") converted ICE_CTL_Q_SQ_CMD_TIMEOUT from jiffies
> to microseconds.
>
> But the ice_release_res() function was missed, and its logic still
> treats ICE_CTL_Q_SQ_CMD_TIMEOUT as a jiffies value.
>
> So correct the issue by usecs_to_jiffies().
>
> Fixes: 5f6df173f92e ("ice: implement and use rd32_poll_timeout for ice_sq_done timeout")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>
Thanks,
I agree with the analysis above and that the problem was introduced
by the cited commit.
As a fix for code present in net this should probably be targeted
at net (or iwl-net?) rather than net-next. But perhaps there is
no need to repost just to address that.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c
> index 6fb0c1e8ae7c..5005c299deb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_common.c
> @@ -1885,7 +1885,7 @@ void ice_release_res(struct ice_hw *hw, enum ice_aq_res_ids res)
> /* there are some rare cases when trying to release the resource
> * results in an admin queue timeout, so handle them correctly
> */
> - timeout = jiffies + 10 * ICE_CTL_Q_SQ_CMD_TIMEOUT;
> + timeout = jiffies + 10 * usecs_to_jiffies(ICE_CTL_Q_SQ_CMD_TIMEOUT);
> do {
> status = ice_aq_release_res(hw, res, 0, NULL);
> if (status != -EIO)
I agree this minimal change is appropriate as a bug fix.
But I think that it would be good to provide a follow-up
that reworks this code a bit to to use read_poll_timeout().
As per the aim of the cited commit.
This should be targeted at net-next (or iwl-next?).
Once this bug fix propagates to in net-next.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists