[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251205171446.2814872-4-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 18:14:34 +0100
From: Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat@...cle.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch@....org>,
Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <codonell@...hat.com>, Sam James <sam@...too.org>,
Dylan Hatch <dylanbhatch@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] x86/unwind_user: Guard unwind_user_word_size() by UNWIND_USER
The unwind user framework in general requires an architecture-specific
implementation of unwind_user_word_size() to be present for any unwind
method, whether that is fp or a future other method, such as potentially
sframe.
Guard unwind_user_word_size() by the availability of the UNWIND_USER
framework instead of the specific HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP method.
This facilitates to selectively disable HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP on x86
(e.g. for test purposes) once a new unwind method is added to unwind
user.
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@...ux.ibm.com>
---
Notes (jremus):
Changes in v3:
- Move includes into more common UNWIND_USER guard at the top of the
source. asm/ptrace.h is required for struct pt_regs.
arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
index a528eee80dd6..4d699e4954ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h
@@ -2,11 +2,27 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_UNWIND_USER_H
#define _ASM_X86_UNWIND_USER_H
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP
+#ifdef CONFIG_UNWIND_USER
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/uprobes.h>
+static inline int unwind_user_word_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* We can't unwind VM86 stacks */
+ if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
+ return 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
+ return sizeof(int);
+#endif
+ return sizeof(long);
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_UNWIND_USER */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNWIND_USER_FP
+
#define ARCH_INIT_USER_FP_FRAME(ws) \
.cfa_off = 2*(ws), \
.ra_off = -1*(ws), \
@@ -21,18 +37,6 @@
.use_fp = false, \
.outermost = false,
-static inline int unwind_user_word_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- /* We can't unwind VM86 stacks */
- if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
- return 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
- return sizeof(int);
-#endif
- return sizeof(long);
-}
-
static inline bool unwind_user_at_function_start(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return is_uprobe_at_func_entry(regs);
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists