[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0efc5d59-53dc-44c6-9466-1f662af7ee7b@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 16:52:49 -1000
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Casey Chen <cachen@...estorage.com>, Yuanyuan Zhong
<yzhong@...estorage.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead
of set->tag_list_lock
On 12/4/25 3:32 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> I'm not interested in introducing rcu synchronize here either. I guess I
> would make it so you can quiesce a tagset from a context that entered
> the queue. So quick shot at that here: [ ... ]
The approach of this patch looks very interesting to me. I will take a
closer look at this patch when I have more time.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists