Message-ID: <aTMqeylKyRwS7mn_@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 00:24:51 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] sched/core: Implement CPU soft offline/online

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2025-12-05 17:03:26]:

Hi Peter, 


> 
> What happens if you then offline one of these softoffline CPUs? Doesn't
> that do sched_cpu_deactivate() again?
> 
> Also, the way this seems to use softoffline_mask is as a hidden argument
> to sched_cpu_{de,}activate() instead of as an actual mask.
> 
> Moreover, there does not seem to be any sort of serialization vs
> concurrent set_cpu_softoffline() callers. At the very least
> update_group_capacity() would end up with indeterminate results.
> 

To serialize soft_offline with actual offline, can we take cpu_maps_update_begin() / cpu_maps_update_done


> This all doesn't look 'robust'.

I figured out when Shrikanth Hegde reported a warning to me today evening.

Basically pin a task to CPU, and then run workload so that the load causes steal and then do a cpu offline 
Pinning just causes the window to be sure enough to hit the case easily.

[  804.464298] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  804.464325] CPU capacity asymmetry not supported on SMT
[  804.464341] WARNING: CPU: 575 PID: 2926 at kernel/sched/topology.c:1677 sd_init+0x428/0x494
[  804.464355] Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 bonding tls rfkill ip_set nf_tables nfnetlink sunrpc pseries_rng vmx_crypto drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks xfs sd_mod sg ibmvscsi scsi_transport_srp ibmveth pseries_wdt dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse
[  804.464409] CPU: 575 UID: 0 PID: 2926 Comm: cpuhp/575 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.18.0-master+ #15 VOLUNTARY
[  804.464415] Hardware name: IBM,9080-HEU Power11 (architected) 0x820200 0xf000007 of:IBM,FW1110.00 (OK1110_066) hv:phyp pSeries
[  804.464420] NIP:  c000000000215c4c LR: c000000000215c48 CTR: 00000000005d54a0
[  804.464425] REGS: c00001801cfff3c0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (6.18.0-master+)
[  804.464429] MSR:  8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28828228  XER: 0000000c
[  804.464441] CFAR: c000000000171988 IRQMASK: 0
               GPR00: c000000000215c48 c00001801cfff660 c000000001c28100 000000000000002b
               GPR04: 0000000000000000 c00001801cfff470 c00001801cfff468 000001fff1280000
               GPR08: 0000000000000027 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
               GPR12: c00001ffe182ffa8 c00001fff5d43b00 c00001804e999548 0000000000000000
               GPR16: 0000000000000000 c0000000015732e8 c00000000153f380 c00000012b337c18
               GPR20: c000000002edb660 0000000000000239 0000000000000004 c000018029a26200
               GPR24: 0000000000000000 c0000000029787c8 0000000000000002 c00000012b337c00
               GPR28: c00001804e7cb948 c000000002ee06d0 c00001804e7cb800 c0000000029787c8
[  804.464491] NIP [c000000000215c4c] sd_init+0x428/0x494
[  804.464496] LR [c000000000215c48] sd_init+0x424/0x494
[  804.464501] Call Trace:
[  804.464504] [c00001801cfff660] [c000000000215c48] sd_init+0x424/0x494 (unreliable)
[  804.464511] [c00001801cfff740] [c000000000226fd8] build_sched_domains+0x1c0/0x938
[  804.464517] [c00001801cfff850] [c000000000228f98] partition_sched_domains_locked+0x4a8/0x688
[  804.464523] [c00001801cfff940] [c000000000229244] partition_sched_domains+0x5c/0x84
[  804.464528] [c00001801cfff990] [c00000000031a020] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x1d8/0x260
[  804.464536] [c00001801cfff9f0] [c00000000031dde4] cpuset_handle_hotplug+0x564/0x728
[  804.464542] [c00001801cfffd80] [c0000000001d9fa8] sched_cpu_activate+0x2d4/0x2dc
[  804.464549] [c00001801cfffde0] [c00000000017567c] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x26c/0xb20
[  804.464556] [c00001801cfffec0] [c000000000177554] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x210/0x2e8
[  804.464561] [c00001801cffff40] [c0000000001c1640] smpboot_thread_fn+0x200/0x2c0
[  804.464568] [c00001801cffff90] [c0000000001b5758] kthread+0x134/0x164
[  804.464575] [c00001801cffffe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18
[  804.464581] Code: 4082fe5c 3d420120 894a2525 2c0a0000 4082fe4c 3c62ff95 39200001 3d420120 38639830 992a2525 4bf5bcbd 60000000 <0fe00000> 813e003c 4bfffe24 60000000
[  804.464598] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---


But this warning will still remain even if we take the cpu_maps_update_begin.

This comes due to
	WARN_ONCE((sd->flags & (SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY)) ==
		  (SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY),
		  "CPU capacity asymmetry not supported on SMT\n");

which was recently added by 
Commit c744dc4ab58d ("sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection")
Is there a way to tweak this WARN_ONCE?

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju

Powered by blists - more mailing lists