[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251205211738.1872244-1-mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 13:17:01 -0800
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: Casey Chen <cachen@...estorage.com>,
Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@...estorage.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/1] block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock
Changes from v3:
- Fixed typos in commit message.
- Updated stacktrace in commit message with one taken from recent kernel.
- Added Fixes: tag to commit message.
- Deleted synchronize_rcu() (added in v3) and pre-existing
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) call in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set().
- Updated the commit message to mention why it is safe to delete
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set().
v3 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251204181212.1484066-1-mkhalfella@purestorage.com/
Mohamed Khalfella (1):
block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of
set->tag_list_lock
block/blk-mq.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.51.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists