[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45232d20-22f0-47e2-aada-8aaaa6106af0@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 14:51:22 -0800
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nathan@...nel.org, nsc@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
void@...ifault.com, arighi@...dia.com, changwoo@...lia.com,
shuah@...nel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com, morbo@...gle.com,
justinstitt@...gle.com, alan.maguire@...cle.com, dolinux.peng@...il.com
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, dwarves@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...nel.org, clm@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] lib/Kconfig.debug: Set the minimum
required pahole version to v1.22
On 12/5/25 2:49 PM, bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> index 742b23ef0d8b..3abf3ae554b6 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> -config PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF
>> - def_bool PAHOLE_VERSION >= 119
>
> The PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF config option was removed here.
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> diff --git a/tools/sched_ext/README.md b/tools/sched_ext/README.md
>> index 16a42e4060f6..56a9d1557ac4 100644
>> --- a/tools/sched_ext/README.md
>> +++ b/tools/sched_ext/README.md
>> @@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ It's also recommended that you also include the following Kconfig options:
>> ```
>> CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON=y
>> CONFIG_BPF_JIT_DEFAULT_ON=y
>> -CONFIG_PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF=y
>> CONFIG_PAHOLE_HAS_BTF_TAG=y
>> ```
>
> The PAHOLE_HAS_SPLIT_BTF reference was removed from
> tools/sched_ext/README.md, but Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst
> still contains this config option at line 46. Should that documentation
> file also be updated to remove this obsolete config option?
Yes. I thought I removed it, but the change got lost in translation.
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/19978081551
Powered by blists - more mailing lists