[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202512050233.R9hAWsJN-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 10:21:55 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: microchip: core: allow driver to be compiled
with COMPILE_TEST
Hi Brian,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Brian-Masney/clk-microchip-core-remove-duplicate-determine_rate-on-pic32_sclk_ops/20251202-060924
base: 92fd6e84175befa1775e5c0ab682938eca27c0b2
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251201-clk-microchip-fixes-v2-3-9d5a0daadd98%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: microchip: core: allow driver to be compiled with COMPILE_TEST
config: arm-randconfig-r071-20251204 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251205/202512050233.R9hAWsJN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 12.5.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202512050233.R9hAWsJN-lkp@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
drivers/clk/microchip/clk-core.c:300 roclk_get_parent() warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'
drivers/clk/microchip/clk-core.c:833 sclk_get_parent() warn: signedness bug returning '(-22)'
vim +300 drivers/clk/microchip/clk-core.c
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 286 static u8 roclk_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
^^
returns a u8.
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 287 {
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 288 struct pic32_ref_osc *refo = clkhw_to_refosc(hw);
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 289 u32 v, i;
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 290
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 291 v = (readl(refo->ctrl_reg) >> REFO_SEL_SHIFT) & REFO_SEL_MASK;
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 292
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 293 if (!refo->parent_map)
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 294 return v;
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 295
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 296 for (i = 0; i < clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw); i++)
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 297 if (refo->parent_map[i] == v)
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 298 return i;
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 299
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 @300 return -EINVAL;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So it can't return negative error codes.
ce6e11884659988 Purna Chandra Mandal 2016-05-13 301 }
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists