linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Add error handling in the sas_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c92623d5-6a52-4d82-bc2a-da358ee1339c@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:52:17 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: Chaohai Chen <wdhh6@...yun.com>, <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
	<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <dlemoal@...nel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Add error handling in the
 sas_register_phys()

在 2025/12/5 16:02, Chaohai Chen 写道:
> If an error is triggered in the loop process, we need to roll back
> the resources that have already been requested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaohai Chen <wdhh6@...yun.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_phy.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_phy.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_phy.c
> index 635835c28ecd..455118c7e889 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_phy.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static void sas_phye_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
>   int sas_register_phys(struct sas_ha_struct *sas_ha)
>   {
>   	int i;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   
>   	/* Now register the phys. */
>   	for (i = 0; i < sas_ha->num_phys; i++) {
> @@ -132,8 +133,10 @@ int sas_register_phys(struct sas_ha_struct *sas_ha)
>   		phy->frame_rcvd_size = 0;
>   
>   		phy->phy = sas_phy_alloc(&sas_ha->shost->shost_gendev, i);
> -		if (!phy->phy)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +		if (!phy->phy) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>   
>   		phy->phy->identify.initiator_port_protocols =
>   			phy->iproto;
> @@ -146,10 +149,22 @@ int sas_register_phys(struct sas_ha_struct *sas_ha)
>   		phy->phy->maximum_linkrate = SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN;
>   		phy->phy->negotiated_linkrate = SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN;
>   
> -		sas_phy_add(phy->phy);
> +		ret = sas_phy_add(phy->phy);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			sas_phy_free(phy->phy);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	return 0;
> +fail:
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		struct asd_sas_phy *phy = sas_ha->sas_phy[i];
> +
> +		sas_phy_delete(phy->phy);
> +		sas_phy_free(phy);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   const work_func_t sas_phy_event_fns[PHY_NUM_EVENTS] = {

Since you are at it, you should also complete Undo_phys label in 
sas_register_ha().

Thanks,
祝一切顺利