[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEg-Je_4-vcyTg+aYA3nTsQ9ekBBZ1h89u9Qk_ZGQ_mGS_5Y4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 08:05:59 -0500
From: Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: switch to library APIs for checksums
On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 2:21 AM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Make btrfs use the library APIs instead of crypto_shash, for all
> checksum computations. This has many benefits:
>
> - Allows future checksum types, e.g. XXH3 or CRC64, to be more easily
> supported. Only a library API will be needed, not crypto_shash too.
>
> - Eliminates the overhead of the generic crypto layer, including an
> indirect call for every function call and other API overhead. A
> microbenchmark of btrfs_check_read_bio() with crc32c checksums shows a
> speedup from 658 cycles to 608 cycles per 4096-byte block.
>
> - Decreases the stack usage of btrfs by reducing the size of checksum
> contexts from 384 bytes to 240 bytes, and by eliminating the need for
> some functions to declare a checksum context at all.
>
> - Increases reliability. The library functions always succeed and
> return void. In contrast, crypto_shash can fail and return errors.
> Also, the library functions are guaranteed to be available when btrfs
> is loaded; there's no longer any need to use module softdeps to try to
> work around the crypto modules sometimes not being loaded.
>
> - Fixes a bug where blake2b checksums didn't work on kernels booted with
> fips=1. Since btrfs checksums are for integrity only, it's fine for
> them to use non-FIPS-approved algorithms.
>
> Note that with having to handle 4 algorithms instead of just 1-2, this
> commit does result in a slightly positive diffstat. That being said,
> this wouldn't have been the case if btrfs had actually checked for
> errors from crypto_shash, which technically it should have been doing.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> v2: rebased onto latest mainline, now that both the crypto library and
> btrfs pull requests for 6.19 have been merged
>
> fs/btrfs/Kconfig | 8 ++--
> fs/btrfs/compression.c | 1 -
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 68 ++++++++----------------------
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 4 --
> fs/btrfs/fs.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> fs/btrfs/fs.h | 23 +++++++---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 ++---
> fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 16 +++----
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 4 --
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 6 +--
> 10 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>
This patch looks reasonable to me and seems to work as expected.
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists