lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251206001720.468579-16-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri,  5 Dec 2025 16:16:51 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@...nel.org>, 
	Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, 
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
	Xin Li <xin@...or.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>, 
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, 
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Manali Shukla <manali.shukla@....com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 15/44] KVM: x86/pmu: Snapshot host (i.e. perf's) reported
 PMU capabilities

Take a snapshot of the unadulterated PMU capabilities provided by perf so
that KVM can compare guest vPMU capabilities against hardware capabilities
when determining whether or not to intercept PMU MSRs (and RDPMC).

Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
Tested-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 487ad19a236e..7c219305b61d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ void kvm_init_pmu_capability(const struct kvm_pmu_ops *pmu_ops)
 	bool is_intel = boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL;
 	int min_nr_gp_ctrs = pmu_ops->MIN_NR_GP_COUNTERS;
 
+	perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(&kvm_host_pmu);
+
 	/*
 	 * Hybrid PMUs don't play nice with virtualization without careful
 	 * configuration by userspace, and KVM's APIs for reporting supported
-- 
2.52.0.223.gf5cc29aaa4-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ