[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0914A8DB-447C-4E62-B151-62E5E4E99749@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 14:15:47 +0200
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] mm/hugetlb: fix excessive IPI broadcasts when
unsharing PMD tables using mmu_gather
> On 5 Dec 2025, at 23:35, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> @@ -400,6 +411,7 @@ static inline void __tlb_reset_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> tlb->cleared_pmds = 0;
> tlb->cleared_puds = 0;
> tlb->cleared_p4ds = 0;
> + tlb->unshared_tables = 0;
> /*
> * Do not reset mmu_gather::vma_* fields here, we do not
> * call into tlb_start_vma() again to set them if there is an
I understand you don’t want to initialize fully_unshared_tables here, but
tlb_gather_mmu() needs to happen somewhere. So you probably want it to
take place in tlb_gather_mmu(), no?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists