[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <693597b0.a70a0220.38f243.005b.GAE@google.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 07:05:20 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+e008db2ac01e282550ee@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Forwarded: [PATCH] mm/workingset: fix NULL pointer dereference in lru_gen_test_recent
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com.
***
Subject: [PATCH] mm/workingset: fix NULL pointer dereference in lru_gen_test_recent
Author: kartikey406@...il.com
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
Add NULL check for memcg in lru_gen_test_recent() to prevent crash when
mem_cgroup_from_id() returns NULL.
The crash occurs when a folio's shadow entry contains a memcg_id that
no longer maps to a valid memory cgroup. This can happen when:
1. The memory cgroup has been deleted/freed
2. A folio was created without proper memcg association (e.g., during
procmap_query build ID parsing via freader_get_folio)
3. The memcg_id in the shadow entry is invalid or zero
When lru_gen_test_recent() calls mem_cgroup_from_id(), it may return
NULL. The subsequent call to mem_cgroup_lruvec() with NULL memcg
triggers a crash.
Although mem_cgroup_lruvec() has an internal NULL check, the crash
occurs before reaching it due to compiler optimization. Since
mem_cgroup_lruvec() is an inline function, the compiler calculates
the offset memcg->nodeinfo (0x4e00) before the function's NULL check
can execute, causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Fix this by introducing an effective_memcg variable that is explicitly
set to root_mem_cgroup when memcg is NULL. This approach forces the
compiler to use a separate register/memory location, preventing the
premature offset calculation that caused the crash with a simple
in-place NULL check.
Reported-by: syzbot+e008db2ac01e282550ee@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e008db2ac01e282550ee
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
---
mm/workingset.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index e9f05634747a..847580173fb0 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -272,8 +272,15 @@ static bool lru_gen_test_recent(void *shadow, struct lruvec **lruvec,
unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcg_id, &pgdat, token, workingset);
memcg = mem_cgroup_from_id(memcg_id);
+ pr_warn("DEBUG: memcg_id=%d memcg=%p root_mem_cgroup=%p\n",memcg_id, memcg, root_mem_cgroup);
+ if (!memcg) {
+ pr_warn("DEBUG: memcg is NULL, using root_mem_cgroup\n");
+ memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
+ pr_warn("DEBUG: after assignment memcg=%p\n", memcg);
+ }
+ pr_warn("DEBUG: about to call mem_cgroup_lruvec with memcg=%p\n", memcg);
*lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
-
+ pr_warn("DEBUG: mem_cgroup_lruvec returned successfully\n");
max_seq = READ_ONCE((*lruvec)->lrugen.max_seq);
max_seq &= EVICTION_MASK >> LRU_REFS_WIDTH;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists