linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] iio: isl29018.c: replace sprintf with safer alternatives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251207160214.0de10c67@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 16:02:14 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Tomas Borquez <tomasborquez13@...il.com>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: isl29018.c: replace sprintf with safer
 alternatives

On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:43:33 -0300
Tomas Borquez <tomasborquez13@...il.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the review Andy!
> > sprintf()
> > "...sysfs_emit() and sysfs_emit_at()..."
> > 
> > alternatives
> > 
> > OR
> > 
> > "...sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at()..."  
> 
> ...
> 
> > Forgot to update indentation.  
> 
> Updated both commit message and indentation in v3
Hi Tomas

I moaning a bit about this today as I have a very long
email backlog.  This comment belongs only in the changelog
of v3.  Sending a reply here just adds noise to the email
queue of reviewers. i.e. Don't reply to just say this.

Jonathan

> 
> Tomas