linux-kernel - [PATCH rc v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE MEV when computing the update sequence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08fd4d48e684732ad58064f690195f31a64979c4.1765140287.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 12:49:14 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: <jgg@...dia.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>
CC: <joro@...tes.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<skolothumtho@...dia.com>, <praan@...gle.com>, <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH rc v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE MEV when computing the update sequence

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>

Nested CD tables set the MEV bit to try to reduce multi-fault spamming on
the hypervisor. Since MEV is in STE word 1 this causes a breaking update
sequence that is not required and impacts real workloads.

For the purposes of STE updates the value of MEV doesn't matter, if it is
set/cleared early or late it just results in a change to the fault reports
that must be supported by the kernel anyhow. The spec says:

 Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced fault
 records even when MEV == 0.

So ignore MEV when computing the update sequence to avoid creating a
breaking update.

Fixes: da0c56520e88 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Set MEV bit in nested STE for DoS mitigations")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e22c0890041b..3e161d8298d9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_get_ste_used);
 VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
 void arm_smmu_get_ste_ignored(__le64 *ignored_bits)
 {
+	/*
+	 * MEV does not meaningfully impact the operation of the HW, it only
+	 * changes how many fault events are generated, thus we can ignore it
+	 * when computing the ordering. The spec notes the device can act like
+	 * MEV=1 anyhow:
+	 *
+	 *  Note: Software must expect, and be able to deal with, coalesced
+	 *  fault records even when MEV == 0.
+	 */
+	ignored_bits[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(arm_smmu_get_ste_ignored);
 
-- 
2.43.0