[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f03ed0ed3d5ffc780fb23d1945d75a6459ffbe22.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:32:46 -0500
From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, mchehab@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
hverkuil@...nel.org
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: verisilicon: AV1: Fix tx mode bit setting
Hi,
Le lundi 08 décembre 2025 à 10:52 +0100, Benjamin Gaignard a écrit :
> If tx_mode field is non-zero then write it value + 2 else
it -> its
> write 0.
Please don't sent a an In-reply-to: email for a patch that isn't part of a
series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
> Fixes: 727a400686a2c ("media: verisilicon: Add Rockchip AV1 decoder")
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/rockchip_vpu981_hw_av1_dec.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/rockchip_vpu981_hw_av1_dec.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/rockchip_vpu981_hw_av1_dec.c
> index f4f7cb45b1f1..fccdece51b1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/rockchip_vpu981_hw_av1_dec.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/rockchip_vpu981_hw_av1_dec.c
> @@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ static void
> rockchip_vpu981_av1_dec_set_parameters(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
> !!(ctrls->frame->flags &
> V4L2_AV1_FRAME_FLAG_ALLOW_HIGH_PRECISION_MV));
> hantro_reg_write(vpu, &av1_comp_pred_mode,
> (ctrls->frame->flags &
> V4L2_AV1_FRAME_FLAG_REFERENCE_SELECT) ? 2 : 0);
> - hantro_reg_write(vpu, &av1_transform_mode, (ctrls->frame->tx_mode ==
> 1) ? 3 : 4);
> + hantro_reg_write(vpu, &av1_transform_mode, ctrls->frame->tx_mode ?
> ctrls->frame->tx_mode + 2 : 0);
That all seem very hacky. Let's step back, and use that as inspiration for a
useful commit message. From bitstream we have:
tx_mode:
0 == 4x4 only
1 == SELECT
2 == LARGEST
And the HW have:
0 == 4x4 only
1 == 8x8 and less
2 == 16x16 and less
3 == 32x32 and less
4 == Select
Since the two enums have no relation (except for value 0), I'd suggest to
translate this in a switch (with nice enums so its readable).
0 -> 0
1 -> 4
2 -> 3
Would be good to check if we can refine with some other params to reach HW value
1 and 2, but otherwise, that mapping is sufficient. Tha hacky +2 is really
obscure to me and I'd rather not do that upstream.
Nicolas
> hantro_reg_write(vpu, &av1_max_cb_size,
> (ctrls->sequence->flags
> & V4L2_AV1_SEQUENCE_FLAG_USE_128X128_SUPERBLOCK) ?
> 7 : 6);
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists