[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <scnexmcrpemu6vcms3dmq7qjvx54h5pyumjvgqduospao4x2kt@hoi7zfygjq4f>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 21:53:33 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] media: dt-bindings: Add CAMSS device for Kaanapali
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 04:39:47AM -0800, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
> Add bindings for qcom,kaanapali-camss to support the Camera Subsystem
> (CAMSS) on the Qualcomm Kaanapali platform.
>
> The Kaanapali platform provides:
>
> - 3 x VFE, 5 RDI per VFE
> - 2 x VFE Lite, 4 RDI per VFE Lite
> - 3 x CSID
> - 2 x CSID Lite
> - 6 x CSIPHY
> - 2 x ICP
> - 1 x IPE
> - 2 x JPEG DMA & Downscaler
> - 2 x JPEG Encoder
> - 1 x OFE
> - 5 x RT CDM
> - 3 x TPG
Please describe the acronyms.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/media/qcom,kaanapali-camss.yaml | 646 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 646 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,kaanapali-camss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,kaanapali-camss.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3b54620e14c6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,kaanapali-camss.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,646 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/qcom,kaanapali-camss.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm Kaanapali Camera Subsystem (CAMSS)
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
> +
> +description:
> + Kaanapali camera subsystem includes submodules such as CSIPHY (CSI Physical layer)
> + and CSID (CSI Decoder), which comply with the MIPI CSI2 protocol.
> +
> + The subsystem also integrates a set of real-time image processing engines and their
> + associated configuration modules, as well as non-real-time engines.
> +
> + Additionally, it encompasses a test pattern generator (TPG) submodule.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: qcom,kaanapali-camss
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: Registers for CSID 0
> + - description: Registers for CSID 1
> + - description: Registers for CSID 2
> + - description: Registers for CSID Lite 0
> + - description: Registers for CSID Lite 1
> + - description: Registers for CSIPHY 0
> + - description: Registers for CSIPHY 1
> + - description: Registers for CSIPHY 2
> + - description: Registers for CSIPHY 3
> + - description: Registers for CSIPHY 4
> + - description: Registers for CSIPHY 5
> + - description: Registers for VFE (Video Front End) 0
> + - description: Registers for VFE 1
> + - description: Registers for VFE 2
> + - description: Registers for VFE Lite 0
> + - description: Registers for VFE Lite 1
> + - description: Registers for ICP (Imaging Control Processor) 0
> + - description: Registers for ICP 0 SYS
> + - description: Registers for ICP 1
> + - description: Registers for ICP 1 SYS
> + - description: Registers for IPE (Image Processing Engine)
> + - description: Registers for JPEG DMA & Downscaler
> + - description: Registers for JPEG Encoder
> + - description: Registers for OFE (Offline Front End)
> + - description: Registers for RT CDM (Camera Data Mover) 0
> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 1
> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 2
> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 3
> + - description: Registers for RT CDM 4
> + - description: Registers for TPG 0
> + - description: Registers for TPG 1
> + - description: Registers for TPG 2
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: csid0
> + - const: csid1
> + - const: csid2
> + - const: csid_lite0
> + - const: csid_lite1
> + - const: csiphy0
> + - const: csiphy1
> + - const: csiphy2
> + - const: csiphy3
> + - const: csiphy4
> + - const: csiphy5
> + - const: vfe0
> + - const: vfe1
> + - const: vfe2
> + - const: vfe_lite0
> + - const: vfe_lite1
> + - const: icp0
> + - const: icp0_sys
> + - const: icp1
> + - const: icp1_sys
> + - const: ipe
> + - const: jpeg_dma
> + - const: jpeg_enc
> + - const: ofe
> + - const: rt_cdm0
> + - const: rt_cdm1
> + - const: rt_cdm2
> + - const: rt_cdm3
> + - const: rt_cdm4
> + - const: tpg0
> + - const: tpg1
> + - const: tpg2
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 60
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: camnoc_nrt_axi
> + - const: camnoc_rt_axi
> + - const: camnoc_rt_vfe0
> + - const: camnoc_rt_vfe1
> + - const: camnoc_rt_vfe2
> + - const: camnoc_rt_vfe_lite
> + - const: cpas_ahb
> + - const: cpas_fast_ahb
> + - const: csid
> + - const: csid_csiphy_rx
> + - const: csiphy0
> + - const: csiphy0_timer
> + - const: csiphy1
> + - const: csiphy1_timer
> + - const: csiphy2
> + - const: csiphy2_timer
> + - const: csiphy3
> + - const: csiphy3_timer
> + - const: csiphy4
> + - const: csiphy4_timer
> + - const: csiphy5
> + - const: csiphy5_timer
> + - const: gcc_axi_hf
This clock (and gcc_axi_sf below) still have the gcc_ prefix and GCC name. Why?
It was pointed out in the previous review: clock names should be
describing their purpose, not their source.
> + - const: vfe0
> + - const: vfe0_fast_ahb
> + - const: vfe1
> + - const: vfe1_fast_ahb
> + - const: vfe2
> + - const: vfe2_fast_ahb
> + - const: vfe_lite
> + - const: vfe_lite_ahb
> + - const: vfe_lite_cphy_rx
> + - const: vfe_lite_csid
> + - const: qdss_debug_xo
> + - const: camnoc_ipe_nps
> + - const: camnoc_ofe
> + - const: gcc_axi_sf
> + - const: icp0
> + - const: icp0_ahb
> + - const: icp1
> + - const: icp1_ahb
> + - const: ipe_nps
> + - const: ipe_nps_ahb
> + - const: ipe_nps_fast_ahb
> + - const: ipe_pps
> + - const: ipe_pps_fast_ahb
> + - const: jpeg
> + - const: ofe_ahb
> + - const: ofe_anchor
> + - const: ofe_anchor_fast_ahb
> + - const: ofe_hdr
> + - const: ofe_hdr_fast_ahb
> + - const: ofe_main
> + - const: ofe_main_fast_ahb
> + - const: vfe0_bayer
> + - const: vfe0_bayer_fast_ahb
> + - const: vfe1_bayer
> + - const: vfe1_bayer_fast_ahb
> + - const: vfe2_bayer
> + - const: vfe2_bayer_fast_ahb
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 30
> +
> + interrupt-names:
> + items:
> + - const: csid0
> + - const: csid1
> + - const: csid2
> + - const: csid_lite0
> + - const: csid_lite1
> + - const: csiphy0
> + - const: csiphy1
> + - const: csiphy2
> + - const: csiphy3
> + - const: csiphy4
> + - const: csiphy5
> + - const: vfe0
> + - const: vfe1
> + - const: vfe2
> + - const: vfe_lite0
> + - const: vfe_lite1
> + - const: camnoc_nrt
> + - const: camnoc_rt
> + - const: icp0
> + - const: icp1
> + - const: jpeg_dma
> + - const: jpeg_enc
> + - const: rt_cdm0
> + - const: rt_cdm1
> + - const: rt_cdm2
> + - const: rt_cdm3
> + - const: rt_cdm4
> + - const: tpg0
> + - const: tpg1
> + - const: tpg2
> +
> + interconnects:
> + maxItems: 4
> +
> + interconnect-names:
> + items:
> + - const: ahb
> + - const: hf_mnoc
> + - const: sf_icp_mnoc
> + - const: sf_mnoc
You know... Failure to look around is a sin. What are the names of
interconnects used by other devices? What do they actually describe?
This is an absolute NAK.
> +
> + iommus:
> + items:
> + - description: VFE non-protected stream
> + - description: ICP0 shared stream
> + - description: ICP1 shared stream
> + - description: IPE CDM non-protected stream
> + - description: IPE non-protected stream
> + - description: JPEG non-protected stream
> + - description: OFE CDM non-protected stream
> + - description: OFE non-protected stream
> + - description: VFE / VFE Lite CDM non-protected stream
This will map all IOMMUs to the same domain. Are you sure that this is
what we want? Or do we wait for iommu-maps to be fixed?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists