[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lpneh6skxhpkalzvpjjresw3akxzzxmizohfzjtwgplzpjbsjc@yje4z22fbhcp>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 14:16:19 +0900
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: qcom: Fix confusing cleanup.h syntax
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 03:08:08AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Initializing automatic __free variables to NULL without need (e.g.
> branches with different allocations), followed by actual allocation is
> in contrary to explicit coding rules guiding cleanup.h:
>
> "Given that the "__free(...) = NULL" pattern for variables defined at
> the top of the function poses this potential interdependency problem the
> recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one statement
> and not group variable definitions at the top of the function when
> __free() is used."
>
> Code does not have a bug, but is less readable and uses discouraged
> coding practice, so fix that by moving declaration to the place of
> assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
Thanks. On the side note, I would recommend adding this check to checkpatch to
warn people in the first place.
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
- Mani
> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 8d119b3223cb..8ebee0cc5313 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -1769,10 +1769,9 @@ static void ufs_qcom_dump_testbus(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
> int i, j, nminor = 0, testbus_len = 0;
> - u32 *testbus __free(kfree) = NULL;
> char *prefix;
>
> - testbus = kmalloc_array(256, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> + u32 *testbus __free(kfree) = kmalloc_array(256, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!testbus)
> return;
>
> @@ -1794,13 +1793,12 @@ static void ufs_qcom_dump_testbus(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> static int ufs_qcom_dump_regs(struct ufs_hba *hba, size_t offset, size_t len,
> const char *prefix, void __iomem *base)
> {
> - u32 *regs __free(kfree) = NULL;
> size_t pos;
>
> if (offset % 4 != 0 || len % 4 != 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - regs = kzalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + u32 *regs __free(kfree) = kzalloc(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!regs)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists