[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251207191756.3ac61680@debian>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 19:17:56 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Stephen Rothwell
<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>, Boqun
Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the ftrace tree
On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 12:43:32 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> If I continue to hear no objections in the next 20 hours or so, I will
> push this into -next:
>
> fca6fa23c5a5 ("tracing: Guard __DECLARE_TRACE() use of __DO_TRACE_CALL() with SRCU-fast")
Hi Paul,
Can you repost the patch as a normal patch (start its own thread) so
that I can look at it separately. I'm currently in Tokyo so I'll likely
get distracted a lot this week.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists