[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4696988.LvFx2qVVIh@workhorse>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:24:52 +0100
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
To: Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/rockchip: vop2: Enforce AFBC source alignment in
plane_check
On Monday, 8 December 2025 03:48:24 Central European Standard Time Chaoyi Chen wrote:
> Hello Nicolas, Daniel,
>
> On 12/7/2025 4:45 AM, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > From: Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>
> >
> > Planes can only source AFBC framebuffers at multiples of 4px wide on
> > RK3566/RK3568. Instead of clipping on all SoCs when the user asks for an
> > unaligned source rectangle, reject the configuration in the plane's
> > atomic check on RK3566/RK3568 only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>
> > [Make RK3566/RK3568 specific, reword message]
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> > index bc1ed0ffede0..e23213337104 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c
> > @@ -1076,6 +1076,13 @@ static int vop2_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + if (vop2->version == VOP_VERSION_RK3568 && drm_is_afbc(fb->modifier) && src_w % 4) {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(vop2->drm,
> > + "AFBC source rectangles must be 4-byte aligned; is %d\n",
> > + src_w);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1237,11 +1244,8 @@ static void vop2_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > WARN_ON(src_w < 4);
> > WARN_ON(src_h < 4);
> >
> > - if (afbc_en && src_w % 4) {
> > - drm_dbg_kms(vop2->drm, "vp%d %s src_w[%d] not 4 pixel aligned\n",
> > - vp->id, win->data->name, src_w);
> > - src_w = ALIGN_DOWN(src_w, 4);
> > - }
> > + if (vop2->version == VOP_VERSION_RK3568 && drm_is_afbc(fb->modifier))
> > + WARN_ON(src_w % 4);
> >
> > act_info = (src_h - 1) << 16 | ((src_w - 1) & 0xffff);
> > dsp_info = (dsp_h - 1) << 16 | ((dsp_w - 1) & 0xffff);
> >
>
> You haven't replied to Andy's comment yet [0].
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/7b4e26ec.75f3.19a77276b53.Coremail.andyshrk@163.com/
>
Hello,
I addressed the follow-ups where it was clarified that the 4 pixel
limitation was RK3566/RK3568-only. I'm not going to bring back the
post-atomic_check modification for a fast path, but I'm open to
suggestions on how to do this differently.
One solution might be to modify the state with the ALIGN_DOWN stuff
in atomic_check instead, where userspace is then aware of the change
being done to its requested parameters. I'll need to double-check
whether this is in line with atomic modesetting's design.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
Powered by blists - more mailing lists