[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DESR20OF30KU.1DCTWADJUFIM9@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 19:06:15 +0900
From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl"
<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter"
<simona@...ll.ch>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas
Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@...dia.com>, "Alistair Popple"
<apopple@...dia.com>, "Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, "Timur
Tabi" <ttabi@...dia.com>, "Edwin Peer" <epeer@...dia.com>,
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, "Nouveau"
<nouveau-bounces@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpu: nova-core: Fixups for GSP message queue and
bindings
On Sun Nov 23, 2025 at 2:12 PM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> This series contains a few fixups for the recently merged GSP
> command-queue code, by order of importance:
>
> - Some explicit padding required to safely implement `AsBytes` was
> missing in the bindings,
> - A bug in the received message length calculation results in the
> message handler being given more data than it should,
> - `MaybeZeroable` is now derived by the kernel's bindgen, but the Nova
> bindings have not been updated for that,
> - Some items in the bindings were referred to using the version module
> directly, instead of the alias we defined to limit the diff when we
> upgrade firmware versions.
>
> All of them address "bugs" (with the first two fixing actual correctness
> issues), but since Nova does not do much anyway, they are also not
> absolutely critical and can wait -rc1 if we prefer to do so.
Alice, Danilo, how would you like to proceed with this series? We could
either:
* Merge this into `drm-rust-next` if you are planning on sending another
before -rc1,
* Wait until -rc1 gets released and send it via `drm-rust-fixes` for
-rc2,
* ... or just take it for 6.20, as it is not absolutely critical.
I am not very familiar with how to do things after the merge window has
opened, so appreciate your guidance here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists