lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTaqCxsGj_waN92Y@aspen.lan>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 10:35:55 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel@...cstar.com>
To: Maud Spierings <maudspierings@...ontroll.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] backlight: add max25014atg backlight

On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 04:20:55PM +0100, Maud Spierings wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 12/4/25 17:17, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 12:53:21PM +0100, Maud Spierings via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > The Maxim MAX25014 is a 4-channel automotive grade backlight driver IC
> > > with integrated boost controller.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maud Spierings <maudspierings@...ontroll.com>
>
> <snip>
>
> > > +static int max25014_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl_dev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct max25014 *maxim = bl_get_data(bl_dev);
> > > +	uint32_t reg;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	if (backlight_is_blank(maxim->bl))
> > > +		bl_dev->props.brightness = 0;
> >
> > This isn't right. Why would you change the backlight level just because
> > it is currently blanked (and sorry I missed this one last time).
>
> so just remove this bit then jeah?

Yes. backlight_get_brightness() is all you should need.


> > > +
> > > +	reg  = TON_STEP * bl_dev->props.brightness;
> >
> > The correct way to honour blanking is just go call
> > backlight_get_brightness() instead of reading the property directly.
>
> will do.

Thanks.


Daniel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ