[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251208110213.92884-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 19:02:13 +0800
From: chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@...il.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chengkaitao <chengkaitao@...inos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] mq-deadline: the dd->dispatch queue follows a FIFO policy
From: Chengkaitao <chengkaitao@...inos.cn>
In the initial implementation, the 'list_add(&rq->queuelist, ...' statement
added to the dd_insert_request function was designed to differentiate
priorities among various IO-requests within the same linked list. For
example, 'Commit 945ffb60c11d ("mq-deadline: add blk-mq adaptation of the
deadline IO scheduler")', introduced this 'list_add' operation to ensure
that requests with the at_head flag would always be dispatched before
requests without the REQ_TYPE_FS flag.
Since 'Commit 7687b38ae470 ("bfq/mq-deadline: remove redundant check for
passthrough request")', removed blk_rq_is_passthrough, the dd->dispatch
list now contains only requests with the at_head flag. In this context,
all at_head requests should be treated as having equal priority, and a
first-in-first-out (FIFO) policy better aligns with the current situation.
Therefore, replacing list_add with list_add_tail is more appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Chengkaitao <chengkaitao@...inos.cn>
---
block/mq-deadline.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 3e3719093aec..dcd7f4f1ecd2 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ static void dd_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
trace_block_rq_insert(rq);
if (flags & BLK_MQ_INSERT_AT_HEAD) {
- list_add(&rq->queuelist, &dd->dispatch);
+ list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &dd->dispatch);
rq->fifo_time = jiffies;
} else {
deadline_add_rq_rb(per_prio, rq);
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists