[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc25b607-f99d-4878-abb7-cff5de13fc2c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 12:24:45 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+e008db2ac01e282550ee@...kaller.appspot.com,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/workingset: fix crash from corrupted shadow entries in
lru_gen
On 12/8/25 07:00, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Syzbot reported crashes in lru_gen_test_recent() and subsequent NULL
> pointer dereferences in the page cache code:
>
> Oops: general protection fault in lru_gen_test_recent+0xfc/0x370
> KASAN: probably user-memory-access in range [0x0000000000004e00-0x0000000000004e07]
>
> And later:
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
> #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
> RIP: 0010:0x0
> Call Trace:
> filemap_read_folio+0xc8/0x2a0
>
> Investigation revealed that unpack_shadow() can extract an invalid node ID
> from shadow entries, causing NODE_DATA(nid) to return NULL for pgdat. In
> the reported case, the shadow value was 0x0000000000000041, which is
> suspiciously small and indicates corruption.
>
> When this NULL pgdat is passed to mem_cgroup_lruvec(), it leads to crashes
> when dereferencing memcg->nodeinfo. The corrupted state also propagates
> through the call chain causing subsequent crashes in page cache code.
>
> The root cause of shadow entry corruption is unclear and may indicate a
> deeper issue in xarray management, page cache eviction/refault race
> conditions, or memory corruption. However, regardless of the source, the
> code should handle corrupted entries defensively.
We should identify+fix the root cause.
[...]
> -
> + /*
> + * If pgdat is NULL, the shadow entry contains an invalid node ID.
> + * Set lruvec to NULL so caller can detect and skip processing.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!pgdat)) {
> + *lruvec = NULL;
> + return false;
> + }
That's just hacking around the root cause, no? Because IIUC, that's not
something we would ever expect to happen unless BUG.
Unless I am missing something this patch is trying to cure the symptoms,
but not the root cause.
Now, if it would be valid (and we would not have a corruption), then
handling it like you propose would be the right thing.
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists