[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <562c7d90-7c8b-46ef-b01f-561d86c722b4@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 19:44:40 +0800
From: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@...ux.dev>
To: Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Gu <cengku@...il.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm pcache: reject mappings larger than backing
在 12/8/2025 7:25 PM, Li Chen 写道:
> Reject pcache targets whose logical size exceeds the backing device.
> Prevent oversized tables from issuing IO past the end of the backing,
> which may corrupt memory and cause kernel crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-pcache/dm_pcache.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/dm_pcache.c b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/dm_pcache.c
> index e5f5936fa6f0..f72d1ba4b740 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-pcache/dm_pcache.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-pcache/dm_pcache.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ static int parse_cache_opts(struct dm_pcache *pcache, struct dm_arg_set *as,
> static int pcache_start(struct dm_pcache *pcache, char **error)
> {
> int ret;
> + struct dm_target *ti = pcache->ti;
> + struct pcache_backing_dev *backing_dev;
>
> ret = cache_dev_start(pcache);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -212,6 +214,19 @@ static int pcache_start(struct dm_pcache *pcache, char **error)
> goto stop_cache;
> }
>
> + /* Sanity-check: logical size must not exceed backing device size */
> + backing_dev = &pcache->backing_dev;
> + if (ti->len > backing_dev->dev_size) {
> + pcache_dev_err(
> + pcache,
> + "backing device too small: logical=%llu sectors, backing=%llu sectors",
> + (unsigned long long)ti->len,
> + (unsigned long long)backing_dev->dev_size);
> + *error = "Requested mapping exceeds backing device size";
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto stop_backing;
> + }
> +
Thanx for your patch, When developing dm-pcache, I considered whether to
add a check there (for target size vs backing device size). But after
looking at other existing targets, it seems none of them implement such
a check, so I wasn't sure there is a requirement; hence I didn't add it
at that time.
On the other hand, given that the “target size” parameter in the mapping
table is a generic parameter, if we want such a check, it would be
better to implement a generic mechanism in the Device-Mapper core
construction path — provide a hook that allows every target to return a
“maximum creatable target size”, and then in the core path validate the
user-provided target size against that max size before creation.
That is just my personal idea; I hope Mikulas can provide more
information about it.
Thanx
> ret = pcache_cache_start(pcache);
> if (ret) {
> *error = "Failed to start pcache";
Powered by blists - more mailing lists