[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c274bd2-3bcc-4b75-9a37-9a6441bd7a50@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 13:42:40 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Patrice
Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Arnaud Pouliquen
<arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Beleswar Padhi
<b-padhi@...com>, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] remoteproc: qcom: Use of_reserved_mem_region_*
functions for "memory-region"
On 02.12.2025 15:15, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 8:28 AM Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
>> On 24.11.2025 19:27, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>> Use the newly added of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() and
>>> of_reserved_mem_region_count() functions to handle "memory-region"
>>> properties.
>>>
>>> The error handling is a bit different in some cases. Often
>>> "memory-region" is optional, so failed lookup is not an error. But then
>>> an error in of_reserved_mem_lookup() is treated as an error. However,
>>> that distinction is not really important. Either the region is available
>>> and usable or it is not. So now, it is just
>>> of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() which is checked for an error.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>> This patch landed in today's linux-next as commit c70b9d5fdcd7
>> ("remoteproc: qcom: Use of_reserved_mem_region_* functions for
>> "memory-region""). In my tests I found that it breaks booting of
>> DragonBoard410c (arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8016-sbc.dts) by causing
>> the NULL pointer dereference. The issue is caused by replacing
>> devm_ioremap_wc() with devm_ioremap_resource_wc(), which fails on
>> devm_request_mem_region(), see comment in the code below. It looks that
>> the error handling is somewhere broken. Here is the the kernel log:
>>
>> remoteproc remoteproc0: 4080000.remoteproc is available
>> qcom-wcnss-pil a204000.remoteproc: error -EBUSY: can't request region
>> for resource [mem 0x8e200000-0x8e7fffff]
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: a204000.remoteproc is available
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: powering up a204000.remoteproc
>> remoteproc remoteproc1: Booting fw image qcom/apq8016/wcnss.mbn, size
>> 4111376
>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffff0
>> Mem abort info:
>> ...
>> Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000046 [#1] SMP
>> Modules linked in: cpufreq_powersave qcom_wcnss_pil cpufreq_conservative
>> coresight_stm coresight_replicator coresight_tmc coresight_tpiu stm_core
>> coresight_funnel coresight_cpu_debug coresight_cti(+) adv7511 coresight
>> nfc rfkill msm snd_soc_lpass_apq8016 snd_soc_apq8016_sbc
>> snd_soc_lpass_cpu snd_soc_msm8916_analog snd_soc_msm8916_digital
>> snd_soc_qcom_common snd_soc_lpass_platform snd_soc_core qrtr ubwc_config
>> snd_compress llcc_qcom snd_pcm_dmaengine qcom_q6v5_mss snd_pcm ocmem
>> qcom_pil_info qcom_spmi_vadc qcom_camss drm_gpuvm qcom_pon rtc_pm8xxx
>> qcom_q6v5 qcom_spmi_temp_alarm venus_core qcom_vadc_common snd_timer
>> drm_exec qcom_sysmon snd qcom_common gpu_sched videobuf2_dma_sg
>> v4l2_mem2mem qcom_glink_smem v4l2_fwnode soundcore drm_dp_aux_bus
>> qmi_helpers mdt_loader v4l2_async videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2
>> videodev qnoc_msm8916 videobuf2_common qcom_rng drm_display_helper mc
>> qcom_stats rpmsg_ctrl rpmsg_char display_connector ramoops socinfo
>> rmtfs_mem reed_solomon ax88796b asix usbnet phy_qcom_usb_hs ipv6 libsha1
>> CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kworker/2:0 Tainted: G W
>> 6.18.0-rc1+ #16209 PREEMPT
>> Tainted: [W]=WARN
>> lr : __qcom_mdt_load+0x210/0x304 [mdt_loader]
>> Call trace:
>> __pi_memcpy_generic+0x128/0x22c (P)
>> qcom_mdt_load+0x68/0x60c [mdt_loader]
>> wcnss_load+0x2c/0x5c [qcom_wcnss_pil]
>> rproc_start+0x30/0x1b4
>> rproc_boot+0x19c/0x560
>> rproc_auto_boot_callback+0x1c/0x34
>> request_firmware_work_func+0x4c/0x98
>> process_one_work+0x208/0x60c
>> worker_thread+0x244/0x388
>> kthread+0x150/0x228
>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>> Code: 927cec03 cb0e0021 8b0e0042 a9411c26 (a900340c)
>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>> v7:
>>> - Split QCom to separate patch
>>> ---
>>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 24 ++++------
>>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 60 ++++++++-----------------
>>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 69 +++++++++++------------------
>>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 25 +++++------
>>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 23 ++++------
>>> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> ...
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
>>> index 2c7e519a2254..14005fb049a2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
>>> @@ -526,25 +526,20 @@ static int wcnss_request_irq(struct qcom_wcnss *wcnss,
>>>
>>> static int wcnss_alloc_memory_region(struct qcom_wcnss *wcnss)
>>> {
>>> - struct reserved_mem *rmem = NULL;
>>> - struct device_node *node;
>>> -
>>> - node = of_parse_phandle(wcnss->dev->of_node, "memory-region", 0);
>>> - if (node)
>>> - rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
>>> - of_node_put(node);
>>> + struct resource res;
>>> + int ret;
>>>
>>> - if (!rmem) {
>>> + ret = of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource(wcnss->dev->of_node, 0, &res);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> dev_err(wcnss->dev, "unable to resolve memory-region\n");
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - wcnss->mem_phys = wcnss->mem_reloc = rmem->base;
>>> - wcnss->mem_size = rmem->size;
>>> - wcnss->mem_region = devm_ioremap_wc(wcnss->dev, wcnss->mem_phys, wcnss->mem_size);
>>> + wcnss->mem_phys = wcnss->mem_reloc = res.start;
>>> + wcnss->mem_size = resource_size(&res);
>>> + wcnss->mem_region = devm_ioremap_resource_wc(wcnss->dev, &res);
>> The above line causes the failure. After restoring it to:
>>
>> wcnss->mem_region = devm_ioremap_wc(wcnss->dev, wcnss->mem_phys, wcnss->mem_size);
>>
>> the mentioned board boots fine again. I'm not sure about other drivers,
>> if they also fail the same way as they might not be used on the tested
>> board.
> Other platforms (non-QCom) were tested also use
> devm_ioremap_resource_wc(). So something else is claiming the same
> region? Can you dump out /proc/iomem?
>
> The region is dynamically allocated, so maybe that has something to do with it.
# dmesg | grep mem
OF: reserved mem: 0x000000008e200000..0x000000008e7fffff (6144 KiB)
nomap non-reusable wcnss
OF: reserved mem: 0x000000008dd00000..0x000000008e1fffff (5120 KiB)
nomap non-reusable venus
OF: reserved mem: 0x000000008dc00000..0x000000008dcfffff (1024 KiB)
nomap non-reusable mba
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086000000..0x00000000862fffff (3072 KiB)
nomap non-reusable tz-apps@...00000
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086300000..0x00000000863fffff (1024 KiB)
nomap non-reusable smem@...00000
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086400000..0x00000000864fffff (1024 KiB)
nomap non-reusable hypervisor@...00000
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086500000..0x000000008667ffff (1536 KiB)
nomap non-reusable tz@...00000
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086680000..0x00000000866fffff (512 KiB) nomap
non-reusable reserved@...80000
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086700000..0x00000000867dffff (896 KiB) nomap
non-reusable rmtfs@...00000
OF: reserved mem: 0x00000000867e0000..0x00000000867fffff (128 KiB) nomap
non-reusable rfsa@...e0000
OF: reserved mem: 0x0000000086800000..0x00000000892fffff (44032 KiB)
nomap non-reusable mpss@...00000
OF: reserved mem: 0x00000000bff00000..0x00000000bfffffff (1024 KiB) map
non-reusable ramoops@...00000
NUMA: Faking a node at [mem 0x0000000080000000-0x00000000bd9fffff]
NODE_DATA(0) allocated [mem 0xbd7c6800-0xbd7c943f]
DMA [mem 0x0000000080000000-0x00000000bd9fffff]
Early memory node ranges
node 0: [mem 0x0000000080000000-0x0000000085ffffff]
node 0: [mem 0x0000000086000000-0x00000000892fffff]
node 0: [mem 0x0000000089300000-0x000000008dbfffff]
node 0: [mem 0x000000008dc00000-0x000000008e7fffff]
node 0: [mem 0x000000008e800000-0x00000000bd9fffff]
...
# cat /proc/iomem
...
80000000-85ffffff : System RAM
80000000-821affff : Kernel code
821b0000-82e5ffff : reserved
82e60000-840fffff : Kernel data
85000000-85013fff : reserved
86000000-892fffff : reserved
89300000-8dbfffff : System RAM
8dc00000-8e7fffff : reserved
8dc00000-8e7fffff : reserved
8e800000-bd9fffff : System RAM
b1000000-b6ffffff : reserved
b7000000-bbe08fff : reserved
bc480000-bd5fffff : reserved
bd621000-bd623fff : reserved
bd624000-bd724fff : reserved
bd725000-bd7b0fff : reserved
bd7b2000-bd7b4fff : reserved
bd7b5000-bd7b5fff : reserved
bd7b6000-bd7c9fff : reserved
bd7ca000-bd9fffff : reserved
The devm_ioremap_resource_wc() requested region (0x8e200000-0x8e7fffff)
is marked as 'reserved' in /proc/iomem.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists