[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251208-io-build-assert-v3-0-98aded02c1ea@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 11:46:58 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] rust: build_assert: document and fix use with
function arguments
`build_assert` relies on the compiler to optimize out its error path,
lest build fails with the dreaded error:
ERROR: modpost: "rust_build_error" [path/to/module.ko] undefined!
It has been observed that very trivial code performing I/O accesses
(sometimes even using an immediate value) would seemingly randomly fail
with this error whenever `CLIPPY=1` was set. The same behavior was also
observed until different, very similar conditions [1][2].
The cause, as pointed out by Gary Guo [3], appears to be that the
failing function is eventually using `build_assert` with its argument,
but is only annotated with `#[inline]`. This gives the compiler freedom
to not inline the function, which it notably did when Clippy was active,
triggering the error.
The fix is to annotate functions passing their argument to
`build_assert` with `#[inline(always)]`, telling the compiler to be as
aggressive as possible with their inlining. This is also the correct
behavior as inlining is mandatory for correct behavior in these cases.
This series fixes all possible points of failure in the kernel crate,
and adds documentation to `build_assert` explaining how to properly
inline functions for which this behavior may arise.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DEEUYUOAEZU3.1J1HM2YQ10EX1@nvidia.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/A1A280D4-836E-4D75-863E-30B1C276C80C@collabora.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251121143008.2f5acc33.gary@garyguo.net/
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Add "Fixes:" tags.
- CC stable on fixup patches.
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20251128-io-build-assert-v2-0-a9ea9ce7d45d@nvidia.com
Changes in v2:
- Turn into a series and address other similar cases in the kernel crate.
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20251127-io-build-assert-v1-1-04237f2e5850@nvidia.com
---
Alexandre Courbot (7):
rust: build_assert: add instructions for use with function arguments
rust: io: always inline functions using build_assert with arguments
rust: cpufreq: always inline functions using build_assert with arguments
rust: bits: always inline functions using build_assert with arguments
rust: sync: refcount: always inline functions using build_assert with arguments
rust: irq: always inline functions using build_assert with arguments
rust: num: bounded: add missing comment for always inlined function
rust/kernel/bits.rs | 6 ++++--
rust/kernel/build_assert.rs | 7 ++++++-
rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs | 2 ++
rust/kernel/io.rs | 9 ++++++---
rust/kernel/io/resource.rs | 2 ++
rust/kernel/irq/flags.rs | 2 ++
rust/kernel/num/bounded.rs | 1 +
rust/kernel/sync/refcount.rs | 3 ++-
8 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ba65a4e7120a616d9c592750d9147f6dcafedffa
change-id: 20251127-io-build-assert-3579a5bfb81c
Best regards,
--
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists